SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Subhash Chandra, Presiding Member and
AVM J. Rajendra, AVSM VSM (Retd.), Member
Karnataka State Warehousing
Corporation – Complainant
versus
Oriental Insurance Company Limited – Opp. Parties
Consumer Complaint No.687 of 2015 With
IA/1081/2016 & IA/1684/2016
(Condonation of delay in filing reply)
Consumer Complaint No.688 of 2015
Decided on 16.05.2025

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant:Ms. Padmapriya, Mr. Rishabh Sancheti, Advocate Mr. Shikhar Bhardwaj, Advocate
For the Opp. Parties:Mr. Ajay Singh, Advocate

IMPORTANT POINT
Insurance—Delay in intimation and FIR can be a valid ground for rejection of insurance claim.

Headnote:

Consumer Protection Act, 1986 – Section 21 [Consumer Protection Act, 2019 – Section 58] – Insurance – Fidelity Guarantee Policy Scheme – Fraud by officers of Corporation – There has been apparent delay/ non-compliance on the part of Complainant with respect to providing necessary details with respect to claim to Surveyor and OP, despite multiple communications – There was delay in filing FIR as well as notifying OP insurer by about eight months, despite being well aware of loss directly contravening condition of Terms and Conditions of Insurance contract entered into between parties – No reasonable explanation was rendered for such protracted delay, despite all necessary inputs being available – Delay effectively denied scope for OP to evaluate circumstances under which loss occasioned with more specific details and determine loss and possibly identify individuals responsible – Complainant failed to provide any plausible explanation for such substantial delay – No case is made out in complaints – Complaints dismissed. (Paras 12, 13 and 14)

Result: Consumer Complaints dismissed.

JUDGMENT

AVM J. Rajendra, AVSM VSM (Retd.), Member—The present Consumer Complaints No. 687 of 2015 and 688 of 2015 have been filed under Section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (“the Act’) against the Opposite Parties seeking to direct the OPs:—

CC No. 687 of 2015

“i. Direct the opposite parties to make payment of an amount of Rs.1,26,13,266 to the complainant towards settlement of its claims arising under and out of the Insurance Policy No.421800/48/2011/2737 with interest at the rate of 12% per annum, past, pendete lite future;

ii. Direct the opposite parties to pay the complainant appropriate compensation for the loss and expenses incurred by the complainant due to the opposite parties’ failure to discharge the insurance agreement in question;

iii. Pass such other order or direction that this commission may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice’.

CC No. 688 of 2015

i. Direct the opposite parties to make pa3mient of an amount of Rs.1,14,96,531 to the complainant towards settlement of its claims arising under and out of the Insurance Policy No.421800/48/2011/2737 with interest at the rate of 12% per annum, past, pendete lite future;

ii. Direct the opposite parties to pay the complainant appropriate compensation for the loss and expenses incurred by the complainant due to the opposite parties’ failure to discharge the insurance agreement in question;

iii. Pass such other order or direction that this commission may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice’.

2. Since the main facts and contentions are substantially similar in both the Complaint Cases, except for the amounts of the losses, claims etc, both Cases are being disposed of by this common order. For convenience CC No.687 of 2015 is considered as the lead case.

3. Brief facts of the case, as per the complainant, are that on 31.12.2010, the Complainant obtained a ‘Fidelity Guarantee Policy Scheme’ No.42180000/48/2011/2737 for Rs.2,00,00,000 and the policy was valid from 01.01.2011 to 31.12.2011. During an audit conducted on 11.01.2011, it was discovered that officers of the Complainant had misappropriated funds and committed fraud during the procurement of Maize at SWH-Devangere-U-I. Consequently, an FIR was lodged on 02.02.2011, at the RMC Yard Police station in Davangere, registered as Cr No 0005/2011. The Complainant notified the Opposite Party (OP) about the incident vide letter dated 21.09.2011, receipt of which was acknowledged by the OP vide email dated 23.09.2011. Subsequently, the Complainant submitted a ‘Claim Form’ on 24.09.2011, claiming an amount of Rs.1,26,13,266 under the aforementioned Insurance Policy with respect to SWH-Davangere U-I exclusively. On receipt of the claim, OP-2 requested additional documents and details vide letter dated 04.10.2011. The Complainant complied and provided the requested information vide letter dated 13.10.2011. On 14.12.2011, the OP inquired about the reasons for delay in filing the insurance claim. On 27.11.2011, M/s. Cunningham Lindsay International Pvt. Ltd., Surveyors and Loss Assessors/Valuers/Investigators appointed by the OP sought further documentation from the Complainant, followed by additional document requests on 04.05.2012. The Complainant furnished all requested documents to the surveyor vide letter dated 27.03.2013. Thereafter, between 27.1.2014, and 25.02.2014, the Complainant sent several reminders to the OP inquiring about the status of the claim. On 18.03.2014, OP-2 responded, informing the Complainant that the claims were being processed by the regional office. The OP again requested for documents from the Complainant vide letter dated 22.04.2014, to which the Complainant responded by sending the relevant documents on 04.09.2014. On 31.10.2014, the Complainant served a legal notice on the OPs. The OPs subsequently requested additional documents through a letter dated 24.12.2014. Finally, on 06.02.2015, the OPs informed the Complainant that their claim had been closed. Aggri

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top