SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

INDER JIT SINGH, SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Sunil Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Ms. Bhairavi S.N., Advocate (VC)
For the Respondent:Mr. Hemant Sharma, Advocate (VC)

ORDER

Dr. Sudhir Kumar Jain, Member.—Briefly stated relevant facts of the case are that the respondent/the complainant/the applicant/Sunil Kumar (hereinafter referred to as “the respondent”) purchased a Bolero car Model S.L.X. M.D.J. T.C. chassis No. 82A15811 engine No. GA84A20396 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the vehicle’) for a sale consideration of Rs.5,83,500 on 31.01.2008. The respondent on 05.02.2008 took a fully covered insurance from the respondents/the non-applicants/the New India Assurance Company Limited/the petitioner (hereinafter referred to as ‘the petitioner’) for the period with effect from 05.02.2008 to 04.02.2009. The petitioner established the declared value of the vehicle to the tune of Rs.5,69,525 and paid the premium amount of Rs.17,812. The respondent on 02.05.2008 had gone to Bhiwadi, District Alwar for personal work from where said vehicle was got stolen. The respondent immediately lodged FIR in the Police Station Bhiwadi. The police after investigation submitted the untraced report on 26.07.2008 before the concerned Court. The respondent submitted the claim along with annexed requisite documents with the petitioner. The petitioner registered the claim bearin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top