SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

A. P. SAHI, BHARATKUMAR PANDYA
Makemytrip (India) Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Sarwan Kumar Sharma – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner: Harsh Vardhan
For the Respondents: Nirmal Pandit

ORDER

A.P. Sahi, President.—These three revision petitions arise out of three orders passed by the DCDRC, Jhajjar in three separate complaints filed by the respondent No. 1 in all the three revision petitions that were allowed by three separate orders of the same date 11.04.2017. Against the said orders the petitioner filed three separate appeals before the SCDRC, Haryana that were dismissed by three separate orders of the same date 08.01.2020. Aggrieved, the petitioners have filed the present three revision petitions contending that the impugned orders deserve to be set aside and the complaints deserve to be dismissed.

2. The facts giving rise to these proceedings in short are that on 31.01.2016 all the complainants booked their flights on GoAir from Delhi to Bangalore as well as a return journey. The present dispute relates to the journey from New Delhi to Bangalore on 11.06.2016 for which e-tickets were purchased recording the schedule departure of the flight at 6.00 hours. According to the complainants, when they reached the airport at 5.05 hours, they were informed by the airport authorities that the flights had been rescheduled for 5.45 hours and since they had not reported wit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top