SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Guj) 200

R.A.MEHTA, P.R.GOKULAKRISHNAN
ALKA CERAMICS – Appellant
Versus
GUJARAT STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: P.M.RAVAL, S.B.TRIVEDI, VITTHALBHAI PATEL

JUDGMENT

P. R. GOKULAKRISHNAN, J.

( 1 ) IN this Group of writ petitions the petitioners are industrial concerns which had taken loans from the respondent-Gujarat State Financial Corporation (hereinafter referred to as Corporation or the GSFC) and executed agreement and deeds of mortgage/pledge/hypothecation. They have made defaults in repayment of the loan and installments thereof and in meeting with their obligations to the respondent-Corporation. The respondent Corporation had therefore resorted to Sec. 29 (1) of the State Financial Corporation Act 1951 (Act No. 63 of 1951) where under the State Financial Corporation has been conferred a right to take over the management or position or both of the industrial concern as well as the right to transfer by way of lease or sale and realise the property pledged mortgaged hypothecated or assigned to the Financial Corporation.

( 2 ) THE petitioners have therefore challenged the constitutional validity of Sec. 9 (1) of the Act and in the alternative the action threatened or taken under that provision. Section 29 (1) of the Act reads as under: 291 Where any industrial concern which is under a liability to the Financial Corporation under agree

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top