SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Guj) 995

B.C.PATEL, C.K.BUCH
DEVENDRA JASHUBHAI RAVAL – Appellant
Versus
AHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: AMIT PANCHAL, ASHOK PANDEY, BHASKAR TANNA, MIHIR JOSHI

C. K. BUCH, J.

( 1 ) RULE. Learned counsel Mr. Amit Panchal appears and waives service of Rule in both the petitions on behalf of the respondents.

( 2 ) THESE two writ petitions are moved under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioners of both the petition. The petitioner of Spl. C. A. No. 9843/2000 has prayed to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or directions declaring the action of the respondent Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "amc" or the "corporation") of removing the permitted articles/structures from the area being No. 3/1 of Larri Stand No. 3 in Final Plot No. 430 (Part) of Ellisbridge TP Scheme No. 3 of the petitioner including paving, electrical installations, water connection and fixtures, as being illegal and unconstitutional and has also further prayed to restrain the respondent Corporation from obstructing the petitioner from carrying on business in acordance with the permissions and resolutions of the respondent in this behalf from time to time. So far as the petitioner of Spl. C. A. No. 7823/2000 is concerned, it has been prayed to issue a writ of mandamus di


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top