BANKIM N.MEHTA, BHAGWATI PRASAD
MODH VINAY KUMAR DASRATH LAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
BHAGWATI PRASAD, J. In this appeal, judgment of learned Single Judge is under question which was given in relation to a selection for the post of Assistant Public Prosecutors (“APPELLANT” for short) Class-II as conducted by the Gujarat Public Service Commission (“Commission” for short). It was prayed before learned Single Judge that the select list which was prepared by GPSC on 16.7.2009 be declared to be illegal because it had infringed the scheme which was laid down for the selection. The case of the appellant is that the examination was to be conducted for the post of APP Class- II in terms of Rules known as “The Assistant Public Prosecutor, Gujarat General State Service, Class-II, Recruitment (Examination) Rules, 2008.
2. According to the appellants, what was required to be done was that in terms of Rule 12, the qualifying marks were required to be fixed at the time when the Notification was to be issued. In the Notification so issued for the selection, minimum marks were delineated. In Part-I examination i.e. the written examination to be 105 marks but as far as viva voce i.e. oral examination is concerned, no minimum qualifying marks were delineated. Therefore, everyb
(1) K. Manjusree v. State of Andhra Pradesh
(2) Hemani Malhotra v. High Court of Delhi. 2008 (7) SCC 11
(3) Sadananda Halo v. Momtaz Ali Sheikh
(4) Amlan Jyoti Borooah v. State of Assam
(5) Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission v. Baloji Badhavath
(7) C. Tulasi Priya v. A. P. State Council of Higher Education
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.