IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
Bhaskar Bhattacharya, J.B. Pardiwala, JJ.
Gajubha (Gajendrasinh) Bhimaji Jadeja and Ors. - Appellants
Vs.
Union of India and Ors. - Respondent
Writ Petition (PIL) No. 21 of 2013, Special Civil Application No. 2621 of 2013, Civil Application No. 9694 of 2013 in Writ Petition (PIL) No. 21 of 2013, Civil Application No. 3558 of 2013 in Special Civil Application No. 2621 of 2013, Civil Application No. 4639 of 2013 in Special Civil Application No. 2621 of 2013 and Civil Application No. 4823 of 2013 in Civil Application No. 3558 of 2013
Decided On: 10.02.2014
Andhra Pradesh Land Reform (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973 - Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Rules 1974 - Rule 11 - To direct respondent nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 and respondent no.5 to take over complete control, administration and supervision of respondent no.8 Mundra Port and Special Economic Zone, looking to the grave violations of Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006 - is mantle and demolish the construction put up on their respective units and remove all and entire development upon the same to the extent of status quo ante - To direct the respondent nos. 1 and 2 to take all civil, criminal and corrective action against respondent nos.8, 10 to 21 for violating Environmental Impact - Held, plea of deemed environmental clearance, we are afraid we are unable to accept such plea for the reasons recorded by us in details - Lessee cannot have a better right then that of a lessor in the property. There cannot be any valid lease for enjoyment of a right in a property at the instance of MPSEZ before obtaining environmental clearance because such a right was not in existence in its favour, and consequently, not capable of being transferred to the lessee at the time of execution of the lease - Petition rejected.
J.B. Pardiwala, J.
1. Since common questions of law and fact are involved in both the captioned petitions, those were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment and order. The petitioners of Writ Petition (PIL) No. 21 of 2013, residing at village Navinal, Mundra Port and Special Economic Zone, Kutch, have prayed for the following reliefs in public interest:--
"(A) To direct respondents and respondent Nos. 10 to 21 in particular to immediately stop further development of the units and business operations in particular from their respective units situated within respondent No. 8 Mundra Port and Special Economic Zone till environmental clearance is granted by respondent Ministry of Environment and Forests in favour of respondent No. 8 Mundra Port and Special Economic Zone;
(B) To direct respondents and respondent Nos. 10 to 21 in particular to completely dismantle and demolish the construction put up on their respective units and remove all and entire development upon the same to the extent of status quo ante;
(BB) To direct respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 and respondent No. 5 to take over complete control, administration and supervision of respondent No. 8 Mundra Port and Special Economic Zone, looking to the grave violations of Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006;
(C) To direct the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to take all civil, criminal and corrective action against respondent Nos. 8, 10 to 21 for violating Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006;
(CC) To direct respondent Nos. 1, 3 and 4 to consider permanently refusing grant of environmental clearance to respondent No. 8 Mundra Port and Special Economic Zone for grave violations of Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006 in the context of subject matter of the present petition;
(D) To direct respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to constitute an independent team of expert to decide the extent of collusion and involvement of statutory, public and Government Authorities in assisting respondent Nos. 8, 10 to 21 in violating the Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006 and thereby develop the land in question and put up construction thereupon and be further pleased to direct taking of civil, criminal and departmental action against erring Officers;
(E) To direct the respondents and particularly respondent Nos. 5, 7 and 9 to prepare panchnama of the land allotted to respondent Nos. 10 to 21 and extent of development of the very land and construction thereupon so far put up by respondent Nos. 10 to 21 and place the same on record;
(F) During pendency and/or final disposal of the present petition be pleased to direct the respondents and respondent Nos. 8, 10 to 21 in particular to immediately stop further development of the units and business operations from respective units and file an undertaking before this Hon'ble Court in this regard AND be further pleased to direct respondent No. 5 Development Commissioner, Mundra Port and Special Economic Zone to ensure that no further development in the respective units take place and business operations are undertaken in any manner whatsoever;
(FF) During the pendency and/or final disposal of the present petition to direct respondent Nos. 1,2,3 and 4 and respondent No. 5 to take over complete control, administration and supervision of respondent No. 8 Mundra Port and Special Economic Zone, looking to the grave violations of Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006;
(G) To award the costs of this petition;
(H) To pass such other and further prayer/s in the interest of justice be granted."
2. The petitioner of Special Civil Application No. 2621 of 2013, an industrial unit engaged in the manufacturing of Advanced Turbine & Generators and Heat Exchanger Equipments for Power Plants at the Mundra Special Economic Zone, has prayed for the following reliefs:--
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction declaring that since APSEZ i.e. Respondent No. 2 has obtained a deemed clearance under Clause 8(iii)
Commissioner of Municipal Corporation, Shimla v. Prem Lata Sood and others
Mansinghbhai Kahalsingbhai and others v. Surat Municipal Corporation and others
Aneeta Hada v. Godfather Travels and Tours Private Limited
Modern Dental College and Research Centre and others v. State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Bharathidasan University and another v. All-India Council for Technical Education and others
Kalidas Umedram and others v. State of Gujarat and another
Mansingbhai Kahalsingbhai v. Surat Municipal Corporation
Ramchandra Shankar Deodhar and others v. The State of Maharashtra and others
Tukaram Kana Joshi and others v. M.I.D.C. and others
P.S. Sadasivaswamy v. State of T.N. AIR 1974 SC 2271
State of M.P. and Ors. v. Nandlal Jaiswal and Ors.
Tridip Kumar Dingal and Ors. v. State of West Bengal and Ors.
Durga Prasad v. Chief Controller of Imports and Exports and Ors. AIR 1970 SC 769
Collector, Land Acquisition, Anantnag and Anr. V. Mst. Katiji and Ors.
Delhi Rohtas Light Railway Company Ltd. v. District Board, Bhojpur and Ors.
Dayal Singh and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
Shankara Co-op. Housing Society Ltd. v. M. Prabhakar and Ors.
Union of India and others v. Major General Madan Lal Yadav [Retd.]
V. Purushotham Rao v. Union of India
Firm Sriniwas Ram Kumar v. Mahabir Prasad and others
N.D. Jayal and another v. Union of India and others
Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum v. Union of India
Samata v. State of Andhra Pradesh
Madhu Kishore v. State of Bihar
State of Himachal Pradesh v. Ganesh Wood Products
Consolidated Coffee Ltd. v. Coffee Board, Bangalore
State of Tamil Nadu v. M/s. Arooran Sugars Ltd.
Harish Tandon v. Addl. District Magistrate, Allahabad
Lt. Col. Prithi Pal Singh Bedi v. Union of India and Ors.
Reserve Bank of India v. Peerless General Finance and Investment Co. Ltd. and others
Raipur Development Authority v. Anupam Sahakari Gruh Nirman Samiti
Indian Council Enviro Legal Action v. Union of India
Sterlite Industries (India) Limited and others v. Union of India and others
M.C. Mehta v. Union of India and others
Lafarge Umiam Mining Private Limited v. Union of India and others
Municipal Corporation, Shimla v. Prem Lata Sood and others
Live Oak Resort (P) Ltd. v. Panchgani Hill Station Municipal Council
Kalidas Umedram and others v. State of Gujarat and another
Mansingbhai Kahalsingbhai v. Surat Municipal Corporation
Rajabhai Abdul Rehman Munshi v. Vasudev Dhanjibhai Mody
Satsangi Shishuvihar Kelavani Trust v. P.N. Patel
Live Oak Resort (P) Ltd. and another v. Panchgani Hill Station Municipal Council and another
Delhi Cloth and General Mills Co. Ltd. and another v. State of Rajasthan and others
State of Bombay v. Pandurang Vinayak and others
State of Karnataka and another v. All India Manufacturers Organization and others
N.D. Jayal and another v. Union of India and others
Lafarge Umiam Mining Private Limited v. T.N. Godavarman and others
Sterlite Industries (India) Limited and others v. Union of India and others
Devilal Modi, Proprietor, M/s. Daluram Pannalal Modi v. Sales Tax Officer, Ratlam and others
Prestige Lights Limited v. State Bank of India
Chairman & MD, BPL Limited v. S.P. Gururaja and others
Netai Bag and others v. State of W.B. and others
State of Madhya Pradesh v. Narmada Bachao Andolan
Corporation of Kolkata v. Mulchand Agrawal
Vemareddy Kumaraswamy Reddy and another v. State of Andhra Pradesh
Ashwani Kumar Singh v. U.P. Public Service Commission and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.