SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Guj) 624

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
A.Y. KOGJE, J.
Shaikh Abdul Quaiyyum Abdul Gafoor & 16 other – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat & 7 Other – Respondent
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4927 OF 2017 WITH R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9743 OF 2018 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR MODIFICATION OF ORDER) NO. 1 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR JOINING PARTY) NO. 3 OF 2019, CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 4 OF 2018, R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6577 OF 2017
Decided On : 28-06-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : MR KB PUJARA
For the Respondent: MR. AYAAN PATEL, AGP, MR KISHANKUMAR R. MAURYA, MS MAMTA R VYAS

Point of Law: There is no scope for interference by Court unless particular provision impugned before it can be said to suffer from any legal infirmity, in sense of its being wholly beyond scope of regulation-making power or its being inconsistent with any of provisions of parent enactment or in violation of any of limitations imposed by Constitution.

Headnote:

Right to Education Act - Recruitment of Vidhya Sahayak teachers - Qualification - Appointment - Government Resolution - Petitioners were not being accepted by online for 19 vacancies in subject of “language” - Petition was filed as applications of those petitioners were not being accepted by online for 19 vacancies in subject of "language" and accordingly, directions were issued to accept applications in physical form - It also appears that on website of Department it was declared that applications thus accepted by pursuant to directions of this Court, on verification it was found that applicants were lacking in prescribed qualification and could not be included in merit list as they are not possessing bachelor degrees in subject "language" - The close scrutiny of Government Resolutions in opinion of Court are in consonance with larger State education policy and appears to have been issued pursuant to deliberations by experts and in consonance with Right to Education Act for whose purpose, resolutions have been passed predominately. (Para 16)

Finding of the court:

It appears that this Court vide order has issued rule and had granted interim relief in terms of para-23(H) by which the further process of recruitment of Vidhya Sahayaks for Urdu medium school pursuant to the advertisement was ordered to be stayed - The close scrutiny of the Government Resolutions in the opinion of the Court are in consonance with the larger State education policy and appears to have been issued pursuant to deliberations by the experts and in consonance with the Right to Education Act for whose purpose, resolutions have been passed predominately. The Court does not find any reason to interfere on the ground of same being illegal, contrary, illogical and going against the interest of the beneficiaries - Court does not find any reason to interfere on ground of same being illegal, contrary, illogical and going against the interest of the beneficiaries - Court is not inclined to interfere petitions.

Result : Petitions dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

1. Considering the nature of issue raised and contentions raised being common in these matters, the same are taken up for joint hearing and disposal.

2. These petitions essentially are in connection with the appointment of Vidhya Sahayak pursuant to a public advertisement dated 22.01.2017 particularly for recruitment of Vidhya Sahayak teachers for language subjects in Urdu medium schools.

3. Apparently, the issue was first agitated in petition being Special Civil Application No.1918 of 2017 which came to be disposed by an order dated 02.02.2017 and the operative part of the order is placed at Annexure-B. At this stage, the petition was filed as the applications of those petitioners were not being accepted by online for 19 vacancies in the subject of “language” and accordingly, the directions were issued to accept the applications in physical form. It also appears that on 10.02.2017 on the website of the Department it was declared that the applications thus accepted by pursuant to the directions of this Court, on verification it was found that the applicants were lacking in prescribed qualification and could not be included in the merit list as they are not possessing bachelor degrees in the subject “language” (Gujarati, Hindi, English and Sanskrit) and therefore, Misc. Civil Application No.424 of 2017 was filed in Special Civil Application No.1918 of 2017 which came to be disposed of as withdrawn to file afresh petition and accordingly, the present petitions appeared to have been filed, wherein elaborate prayers are made challenging the decision of holding the petitioners to be ineligible for recruitment of Vidhya Sahayak in Urdu Medium for the subject “language” (Gujarati, Hindi, English and Sanstkrit). The petitioners also prayed for quashing and setting aside the Government Resolution dated 27.04.2011 which prescribes the qualification criteria for the post of Vidhya Sahayak to the extent that the same does not provide for qualification of B.A. with Urdu alongwith qualification of B.A. in English, Gujarati, Hindi and Sankstrit. The petitioners also have prayed in alternative to provide for including the subject of Urdu language alongwith other languages namely English, Gujarati, Hindi and Sankstri, where the educational qualification criteria was prescribed as B.A. in respective language and similarly, to prescribe qualification criteria of B.A. with Urdu for appointment as Vidhya Sahayak in Urdu Medium school.

4. The petitioners have also prayed for quashing and setting aside the Government Resolution dated 28.04.2016 to the extent that it holds the candidates who have not studied Urdu medium at school level or college level as eligible candidates only on the basis of having appeared in board examination of standard 12th with one of Urdu as a subject and thereby declared that for appointment as Vidhya Sahayak in Urdu Medium school, a candidate must compulsorily have studied in Urdu Medium from standard 1st to standard 12th.

5. Special Civil Application No.9743 of 2018 is also for the similar prayers, whereas Special Civil Application No.6577 of 2017 is filed with a prayer to quash and set aside the Resolution dated 28.04.2016 to the extent that it holds those candidates who have not studied in Urdu Medium School, but have studied Urdu as subject language in standard 12th also by appearing as an external subject as eligible for the appointment of Vidhya Sahayak in Urdu Medium school. The ancillary prayer is also made seeking direction to convert the seats which have remained vacant in the S.T. Category into an open category in order to accommodate candidate of SEBC Category.

5.1. Despite all these prayers, the main focus of the arguments of non considering the petitioners’ candidature and the petitioners as eligible candidates as Vidhya Sahayak to teach the subjects of English, Hindi, Gujarati and Sanskrit as they

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon Back to top