ASHVINKUMAR AMBALAL CHAUHAN vs STATE OF GUJARAT

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Guj) 1258

BIREN VAISHNAV
ASHVINKUMAR AMBALAL CHAUHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: GUNVANT R. THAKAR, BHARGAVI G. THAKAR.
For the Respondents: UTKARSH SHARMA, H.S. MUNSHAW.

JUDGMENT :

BIREN VAISHNAV, J.

1. Heard Ms. Bhargavi Thakar learned advocate for the petitioners, Mr. Utkarsh Sharma learned AGP for the respondents State and Mr. H.S. Munshaw learned counsel for the respondent-District Development Officer.

2. The details of the petitioners who all were appointed as Junior Clerks, in each petition are as under:

Petitioner of SCA No.	Date of order	Appointed with effect from
17150/2019	30.09.2004	28.10.2004
18659/2019	25.07.2004	01.11.2004
2864/2020	25.07.2004	02.11.2004
2868/2020	04.10.2004	23.11.2004
2870/2020	12.08.2004	02.11.2004
3028/2020	21.09.2004	23.11.2004
6143/2020	13.09.2004	10.02.2005

3. For the purposes of this order, the prayer of Special Civil Application No. 17150 of 2019 is considered.

4. The case of the petitioners is that the respondents be directed to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order holding that the petitioners are entitled for regular appointment to the post of Junior Clerk in the regular pay scale from the date of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(Guj) 1258

BIREN VAISHNAVASHVINKUMAR AMBALAL CHAUHAN – AppellantVersusSTATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent

BIREN VAISHNAV
ASHVINKUMAR AMBALAL CHAUHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent