IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
NIKHIL S. KARIEL
Patel Kayam Ali – Appellant
Versus
District Development Officer – Respondent
ORDER :
NIKHIL S. KARIEL, J.
1. Heard learned Advocate Mr. Himanish Japee for the petitioners and learned AGP Ms. Tanushree Shrimal for the respondent-State in all the petitions and learned Advocate Mr. Hemang S. Trivedi for the respondent No.1 in Special Civil Application No. 12508 of 2025 and learned Advocate Mr. Kaash K. Thakkar for the respondent No.1 in Special Civil Applications No. 8399 of 2025, 6849 of 2025 and 1771 of 2025.
1.1 Learned Advocate Mr. Kaash Thakkar has tendered an affidavit-in- reply on behalf of the respondent No.1 in Special Civil Application No.6849 of 2025. The same is taken on record.
2. Issue Rule. Learned Advocates for the respective respondents waive service of Rule.
3. Since a common issue has been raised in all these writ petitions, with the consent of the parties, the present petitions are taken up for final hearing together.
4. At the outset, learned advocate for the respective petitioners would submit that the issue raised in these petitions is covered by a decision of this Court in Special Civil Application No.10738 of 2020 and allied matters dated 14.03.2024 and whereas it is submitted that the said decision with a modification had been confirmed by
Petitioners, appointed on compassionate grounds, are entitled to regular pay scales and benefits consistent with earlier court decisions, regardless of the delay in their applications.
Compassionate appointments should align with substantive employment rights, and any delay in claims does not negate entitlements when based on continuing wrongs.
The court affirmed the right of petitioners, appointed on compassionate grounds, to be considered for regular pay-scale from their initial appointment date, with restrictions on arrears limited to th....
Petitioners entitled to modified compassionate appointment orders at regular pay scale from initial appointment date, with arrears limited to three years prior to filing date.
The court affirmed that employees appointed on compassionate grounds are entitled to regular pay scales from the initial date of appointment, subject to a limit of three years for the payment of arre....
Employees appointed on compassionate grounds must receive regular pay-scale benefits from their initial appointment date, despite delays in filing petitions.
Compassionate appointment claims must adhere to established policy principles and be granted uniformly to similarly situated individuals despite filing delays, with arrears limited to three years bef....
Petitioners entitled to receive modified appointment orders with regular pay scales from the original appointment date, along with arrears for three years prior to filing of petitions.
The court ruled that petitioners appointed on compassionate grounds are entitled to regular pay scale from their initial appointment date, alongside arrears for three years prior to filing petitions.
Court ruled compassionate appointments must offer regular pay from the date of appointment, ensuring parity for similarly situated individuals, reinforcing precedential authority over state policy ar....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.