Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
NIKHIL S. KARIEL
Munafkumar Yunisbhai Sumra – Appellant
Versus
District Development Officer – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initial hearings and parties represented. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. common issue raised by petitioners. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. petitioners' appointment context and issues. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. division bench modifications and effects. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. observations from previous judgments relevant. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 6. judgment conclusions and directives. (Para 11) |
ORDER :
Nikhil S. Kariel, J.
1. Heard learned Advocate Mr. Himanish Japee for the petitioners and learned AGP Mr. Aditya Pathak for the respondent-State in all the petitions and learned Advocate Ms. Krupali N. Bhatt for the respondent No.1 in Special Civil Application No. 8420 of 2025, learned Advocate Mr. Manish J. Patel for the respondent No.1 in Special Civil Application No. 8524 of 2025, learned Advocate Mr. Nisarg N. Jani for the respondent No.1 in Special Civil Application No. 8812 of 2025 and learned Advocate Ms. Sejal K. Mandavia for the respondent No.1 in Special Civil Application No. 9333 of 2025 .
2. Issue Rule. Learned Advocates for the respective respondents waive service of Rule.
3. Since a common issue has been raised in all these writ petitions, with the consent of the parties, the present petitions are taken up for final h
Compassionate appointments should align with substantive employment rights, and any delay in claims does not negate entitlements when based on continuing wrongs.
Petitioners, appointed on compassionate grounds, are entitled to regular pay scales and benefits consistent with earlier court decisions, regardless of the delay in their applications.
The court affirmed the right of petitioners, appointed on compassionate grounds, to be considered for regular pay-scale from their initial appointment date, with restrictions on arrears limited to th....
Petitioners entitled to modified compassionate appointment orders at regular pay scale from initial appointment date, with arrears limited to three years prior to filing date.
The court affirmed that employees appointed on compassionate grounds are entitled to regular pay scales from the initial date of appointment, subject to a limit of three years for the payment of arre....
Compassionate appointment claims must adhere to established policy principles and be granted uniformly to similarly situated individuals despite filing delays, with arrears limited to three years bef....
Employees appointed on compassionate grounds must receive regular pay-scale benefits from their initial appointment date, despite delays in filing petitions.
The court established that similarly situated employees are entitled to the same benefits as previously determined in comparable cases, ensuring equity in compassionate appointments and rectifying pa....
Petitioners entitled to receive modified appointment orders with regular pay scales from the original appointment date, along with arrears for three years prior to filing of petitions.
The court ruled that petitioners appointed on compassionate grounds are entitled to regular pay scale from their initial appointment date, alongside arrears for three years prior to filing petitions.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
