HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK
Jetpur Taluka Co-operative Kharid Vechan Sangh – Appellant
Versus
Dilipkumar Shantilal Parekh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and order dated 7.3.2005 passed by the learned Joint District Judge and P.O. 9th Fast Track Court, At Gondal in Regular Civil Appeal No.17 of 2001 confirming the judgment and order dated 13.2.2001 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Gondal, in Regular Civil Suit No.68 of 1986, the appellants have filed the present Appeal.
2. Heard learned Counsels appearing for the respective parties. I have perused the judgment and order passed by both the Courts below and also taken into account the material placed on record of the appeal.
3. The First Appellate Court has to apply its mind independently and frame the issues appropriately and independently. The provisions of Order 41 of C.P.C. provides that how the Appellate Court has to deal with the Appeal under Section 96 of the Code and the procedure is to be followed as per Order 41 of C.P.C.
4. In the recent judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in case of K. Karuppuraj vs M. Ganesan reported in 2021 (10) SCC 777, the Hon’ble Apex Court has held that while deciding the First Appeal, compliance of Order 41 Rule 31 of C.P.C. is mandatory.
5. In the recent judgment of the
B.V. Nagesh v. H.V. Sreenivasa Murthy
Babubhai Velani Vs Rameshbhai Prajapati
Budhabhai Bhikabhai Parmar Vs Shantaben, wd/o Bhelabhai
G. Amalorpavam v. R.C. Diocese of Madurai
Gannmani Anasuya v. Parvatini Amarendra Chowdhari
Girijanandini Devi v. Bijendra Narain Choudhary
Santosh Hazari v. Purushottam Tiwari
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.