HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK
Gulam Kadar G Patel – Appellant
Versus
Heirs of Decd. Pyaresaheb Mahmudmiya Saiyed – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and order dated 23.12.2004 passed by the learned Joint District Judge, Fast Track Court No.7, at Bharuch in Regular Civil Appeal No.71 of 1998, the appellant has filed the present Appeal.
2. Heard learned Counsels appearing for the respective parties. I have perused the judgment and order passed by both the Courts below and also taken into account the material placed on record of the appeal.
3. The First Appellate Court has to apply its mind independently and frame the issues appropriately and independently. The provisions of Order 41 of C.P.C. provides that how the Appellate Court has to deal with the Appeal under Section 96 of the Code and the procedure is to be followed as per Order 41 of C.P.C.
4. In the recent judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in case of K. Karuppuraj vs M. Ganesan reported in 2021 (10) SCC 777, the Hon’ble Apex Court has held that while deciding the First Appeal, compliance of Order 41 Rule 31 of C.P.C. is mandatory.
5. In the recent judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in case of K. Karuppuraj (supra) and Judgments of this Court, which are referred hereinafter, time and again reiterated by this Court
B.V. Nagesh v. H.V. Sreenivasa Murthy
Babubhai Velani Vs Rameshbhai Prajapati
Dumala Vahpara Gram Panchyat vs. Chunilal Tribhovandas Patel & Ors.
G. Amalorpavam v. R.C. Diocese of Madurai
Gannmani Anasuya v. Parvatini Amarendra Chowdhari
Girijanandini Devi v. Bijendra Narain Choudhary
Mahmad Ahmadbhai vs. Fatmaben Abdulla & Ors.
Prajapati Abraham Nagarbhai & Anr. Vs. Prajapati Harjibhai & Ors.
Santosh Hazari v. Purushottam Tiwari
Compliance with Order 41 Rule 31 of C.P.C. is mandatory while deciding the First Appeal. The appellate Court must independently assess the evidence of the parties and consider the relevant points whi....
Mandatory compliance with Order 41 Rule 31 of the C.P.C is required for the First Appellate Court while deciding the First Appeal.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the mandatory compliance of Order 41 Rule 31 of C.P.C. by the First Appellate Court while deciding the appeal.
The First Appellate Court is obligated to comply with the mandatory requirements of Order 41 Rule 31 of C.P.C. and decide the appeal in accordance with law on merits after framing points for determin....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the mandatory requirement for the First Appellate Court to frame specific points for determination and independently assess the evidence, as per Or....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the mandatory compliance with Order 41 Rule 31 of C.P.C., emphasizing the need for the First Appellate Court to independently assess the evidence, ....
The First Appellate Court's obligation to independently assess evidence and frame specific points for determination in accordance with Order 41 Rule 31 of C.P.C. to ensure a judicial decision-making ....
The First Appellate Court's obligation to independently assess evidence and frame specific points for determination as required by Order 41 Rule 31 of the C.P.C. is mandatory and failure to comply ma....
The First Appellate Court is obligated to frame specific points for determination in accordance with Order 41 Rule 31 of the C.P.C. and to decide the appeal in adherence to the requirements of the sa....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the mandatory compliance of Order 41 Rule 31 of C.P.C. and the Bombay Civil Manual by the First Appellate Court while deciding the appeal.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.