A. P. THAKER
Porbandar Nagarpalika Through Chief Officer – Appellant
Versus
Kishorchandra Krushnalal Joshi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The present Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure by the original defendant against the judgment and decree dated 12.01.2011 passed by the learned Additional District Judge and Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court Porbandar in Regular Civil Appeal No.32 of 1982, whereby the First Appellate Court has confirmed the judgment and decree passed by the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Porbandar in Regular Civil Suit No.17 of 2008.
2. The appellant is the original defendant and respondent is the original plaintiff before the Trial Court. For the brevity and convenience, the parties are referred to in this judgment as per the character assigned to them before the Trial Court, i.e. plaintiff and defendant.
3. The brief facts giving rise to the suit of the plaintiff is that; the plaintiff was working as an Octroi Clerk since the year 1962 as permanent employee in the defendant’s department. It is contended that the defendants have issued suspension order on 06.08.1981 and has also issued show cause notice. It is alleged by the plaintiff that before issuance of suspension order, prior show cause notice needs to be issued to him. It is contended
The Premier Automobiles Ltd. vs. Kamlekar Shantaram Wadke of Bombay & ors. 1976 (1) SCC 496
Satyavir Singh & ors. vs. Union of India & ors. 1985 (4) SCC 252
Union of India & Anr. vs. Tulsiram Patel 1985 (3) SCC 398
Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & ors. vs. Mohar Singh 2008 (5) SCC 542
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.