IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
ARAVIND KUMAR, ASHUTOSH J. SHASTRI, JJ.
SURYASE ENERGY – Petitioner
Versus
MADHYA GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LTD. – Respondent
Special Civil Application No. 11105 of 2022
Decided On : 22-08-2022
Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 14, 226 – Petitioners have prayed reliefs – Testing and commissioning including warranty – Petitioners have prayed for reliefs – Held, Court should not normally interfere with and it has also been held that interpretation of terms and conditions is essentially left to author of tender document and occasion for interference by Court would only arise if questioned decision fails salutary test laid down by Hon’ble Supreme Court in consistent decisions, irrationality or unreasonableness or bias or procedural impropriety – Terms of tender if clear and ascertainable principle of restraint would require to be kept in mind by Court – Hence, in view of aforesaid observations of Hon'ble Apex Court when contentions raised by petitioner in present case on hand is examined, Court are of opinion that petitioner has not made out any case calling for court interference – Petition dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
ASHUTOSH J. SHASTRI, J.
1. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioners have prayed for following reliefs:
(b) This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the respondent MGVCL to accept the technical bid of the petitioner; and further be pleased to direct the respondent to consider the physical copy of the tender received by MGVCL through India Post on 03.06.2022 in time.
(c) Pending the hearing and final disposal of the writ petition the Hon'ble Court be pleased to stay the tender process of the tender dated 09.02.2022 being Tender No. MGVCL/DSM/EOV/SRT/2021-22/2137 for Design, supply, erection, testing and commissioning including warranty, Comprehensive operation & maintenance of Grid - Connected Rooftop Solar Plant of various capacities under the Phase-II of Grid Connected Rooftop Solar Scheme of MNRE/SURYA Gujarat Scheme in the State Gujarat during the Year (2021-22) for Residential Consumers in Urban Area.
(d) Be pleased to quash and set-aside the condition of physical submission of tender copy by 02.06.2022 in the corrigendum XI dated 30.05.2022.
(e) Be pleased to quash and set-aside the rejection communication by the respondent MGVCL (at Annexure E).
(f) Pass such further and other order as the nature and Circumstances of the case may require.”
2. The case of the petitioners is that respondent No. 1 invited tender for Design, supply, erection, testing and commissioning including warranty, Comprehensive operation & maintenance of Grid - Connected Rooftop Solar Plant of various capacities under Phase-II of Grid Connected Rooftop Solar Scheme of MNRE/SURYA Gujarat Scheme in the State during the Year 2021-22 for Residential Consumers in Urban Area, being Tender No: EOV No. MGVCL/DSM/EOV/SRT/2021-22/2137 on 09.02.2022. Pursuant to such tender notice, since the petitioners are registered firms, they filled-in their respective Bids. Subsequently, the respondent-authority issued certain corrigendums extending the date for submission of Bids online as well as off-line from time to time. By detailing out in paragraph No. 6, in the form of Chart, the respective dates have been mentioned by virtue of which, the petitioners have submitted their respective Bids. The said Chart reads as under:
| S. No. | Name of petitioner | Date of online submissions | Date of speed post/RPAD | Date of delivery of Speed Post/RPAD |
| 1. | Suryase Energy | 30.05.2022 | 31.05.2022 | 03.06.2022 |
| 2. | Solarmax Energy Pvt. Ltd. | 31.05.2022 | 01.06.2022 | 03.06.2022 |
| 3. | Upvoltage Solutions LLP | 30.05.2022 | 02.06.2022 | 03.06.2022 |
| 4. | Green Solar Energy | 03.06.2022 | 04.06.2022 due dated was 08.06.2022 | Return on 03.06.2022 due to fault of India post |
| 5. | The Solar House | 30.05.2022 | 01.06.2022 | 03.06.2022 |
| 6. | Tulsikamal Energy | 31.05.2022 | 01.06.2022 | 03.06.2022 |
| 7. | Vision Infosys | 31.05.2022 | 01.06.2022 | 03.06.2022 |
2.1 According to the petitioners, the requirement of MGVCL was to send physical copy of documents only through RPAD or Speed Post from Government Postal Department. The petitioner No. 3 after submitting online Bid tried to contact several branches including the main branch of Indian Post in Ahmedabad to ensure that post reaches the office of MGVCL by 02.06.2022 and later on, as advised by several branch offices of Indian Post, the petitioner No. 3 had personally went to Vadodara in the main branch for same day delivery but despite that, the post had reached the respondent on 03.06.2022. Petitioners have further asserted that in all previous corrigendums, the general time limit for submission of physical d
Agmatel India Private Limited vs. Resoursys Telecom and Others
District Collector is not empowered to consider the aspect of alteration of any route or alignment except to remove difficulties faced by the licensee. As a result of this, even the request of altern....
The main legal point established is that technical errors in bid submission do not warrant interference in the tender process, especially when it may delay the implementation of a public project.
The conflicting requirement for physical submission in a tender process was deemed unenforceable, emphasizing the importance of adhering to statutory rules in tender processes.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the limited scope of judicial review in tender conditions, emphasizing the authority of the tendering entity to interpret and appreciate its requir....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.