S. V. PINTO
Kalubha Champubha Darbar – Appellant
Versus
Prabhashankar Parsottambhai Maheta – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The present Second Appeal under section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 has been filed against the judgment and decree passed by the learned 3rd Additional District Judge, Ahmedabad (Rural), at Viramgam in Regular Civil Appeal No. 33 of 2018 on 24.2.2021 whereby, the learned 3rd Additional District Judge, Ahmedabad (Rural) was pleased to confirm the judgment and decree dated 31.3.2017 passed by the learned Principal Civil Judge, Mandal in Regular Civil Suit No. 250 of 2016 (Old Regular Civil Suit No. 317 of 2015).
2. The appellant herein is the original defendant and the respondent- original plaintiff had filed a suit for property situated in the outskirt of Mouje Vitthalpur, Taluka Mandal bearing Block/Survey No. 147 paiki in revenue account No. 212 and admeasuring 0-87-01 (H.are.sq.m.) [hereinafter referred to as the “disputed suit property”] mainly stating that the agricultural property is in the ownership and possession of the plaintiff and he had purchased the said property by a registered sale-deed from the original owners Chhaganbhai Makwana, Dhudabhai and Arjanbhai which was registered before the Sub Registrar Viramgam at S. No. 290. That, the appellant-ori
K. Venkataramiah vs. A. Seetharama Reddy and Others
State Bank of India vs. S.N. Goyal
State of U.P. vs. Manbodhan Lal Srivastava
S. Rajagopal vs. C.M. Armugam and Others
Syed Abdul Khader vs. Rami Reddy and Others
Soonda Ram and Another vs. Rameshwaralal and Another
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay vs. Lala Pancham and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.