IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK, J.
Desai Pravinchandra Ranchhodbhai & Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
State Of Gujarat & Ors. – Respondents
R/Special Civil Application No. 21100 of 2016 with R/Special Civil Application No. 21103 of 2016
Decided On : 16-04-2024
Mandamus - Petition for Revised Pay Scale - 1986 - 1992 - Government Resolution dated 08.10.1992 - 27.03.2017 - 31.03.2014 - 28.07.2015 - 1640-2900 - 01.01.1986 - 01.04.1992
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, Additional Assistant Engineers, sought the application of the revised pay scale from 01.01.1986 instead of 01.04.1992, as directed by the court in a previous case. The respondents failed to implement the court's decision, leading to the present petitions.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioners were entitled to the benefits of the revised pay scale as per the judgment of the Division Bench, which was confirmed and approved by the Supreme Court. The impugned order denying the benefit was held to be contrary to the court's decision and was quashed and set aside.
Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioners were entitled to the benefits of the revised pay scale as directed by the court in a previous case.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioners were entitled to the benefits of the revised pay scale as per the judgment of the Division Bench, which was confirmed and approved by the Supreme Court. The impugned order denying the benefit was held to be contrary to the court's decision and was quashed and set aside.
Final Decision: The petitions were allowed, and the respondents were directed to revise the pay scales of the petitioners and pay all consequential benefits within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the order.
JUDGMENT :
1. Present petitions are filed by the respective petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following reliefs;
(B) Your Lordships may be pleased to declare that the inaction on the part of the respondent authorities of applying the oral judgment dated 31.03.2014 passed in Letters Patent Appeal No.834 of 2012 and Government Resolution dated 28.07.2015 to the petitioners is bad in law, arbitrary, capricious, discriminatory and violative of the petitioners’ fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India;
(C) Your Lordships may be pleased to declare Government Resolution dated 08.10.1992 as arbitrary and discriminatory and thus violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India to the extent that it made the revision of pay scale of the petitioners effective from 01.04.1992 instead of 01.01.1986;
(CA) Your Lordships may be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the impugned Government Resolution dated 27.03.2017 from the Panchayat, Rural Housing and Rural Development Department as illegal, arbitrary and discriminatory and thus violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and quashing and setting aside the same.
(D) Your Lordships may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the respondent authorities to apply the pay scale of Rs.1640 – 2900 to the petitioners from 01.01.1986 and not from 01.04.1992 and consequently, refix their pay in the corresponding pay scales recommended by the Fifth, Sixth and Seventh Central Pay Commissions with corresponding revision of retirement benefits, such as pension, gratuity etc. accordingly, wherever applicable;
(E) Pending admission and final hearing of the present petition, Your Lordships may be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to consider the case of the petitioners for grant of pay scale of Rs.1640 – 2900 with effect from 01.01.1986; and
(F) Your Lordships be pleased to pass any other appropriate order, as deemed fit, in the interest of justice;”
2. As both the petitions are arising out of the same issue, they are being disposed of by this common judgment.
3. The issues arise in both the petitions are to give effect to the Government Resolution dated 09.10.1992 from 01.01.1986 instead of 01.04.1992 and to pay the arrears of difference in salary and difference in increments with interest and refix the salaries / pay of the Additional Assistant Engineers.
4. As both the petitions are relating to the same issue, both the petitions have been tagged and the same are disposed of by this common judgment by treating Special Civil application No.2100 of 2016 as lead matter.
5. So far as the lead matter, i.e. Special Civil Application No.21100 of 2016 is concerned, same is arising from the following background of facts:-
5.1 The petitioners came to be appointed as Additional Assistant Engineers in the roads and Building Division and Irrigation Division of Bhavnagar District Panchayat and some of the petitioners were retired from the services on their attaining the age of superannuation. It is the case of the petitioners that the recommendations of the Fourth Pay Commission came in the year 1986 and the State Government accepted the recommendations of the Pay Commission. That the pay scales of the Assistant Engineers and Additional Assistant Engineers were revised by the Gujarat Civil Services (Revision of Pay) Rules 1987 w.e.f. 01.01.1986 and the pay scale of Assistant Engineer was revised from Rs.550 – 900 to Rs.1640 – 2900 and that of Additional Assistant Engineers from Rs.425 – 700 to Rs.1
State of Gujarat and another Vs. Raman Lal Keshav Lal Soni and Others
Inder Pal Yadav and others Vs. Union of India and others
Vipulkumar Atmaram Parekh and others Vs. State of Gujarat through the Secretary and Others
The court reaffirmed the principle that equally situated persons should be treated equally in consonance with Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.
Members of the Petitioner Association ought to have been treated equally w.e.f. 1.1.1986. In view of this fact, we are of the opinion that the end of justice would be served if the respondents are di....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the petitioners were entitled to the benefits of the revised pay scale as per the judgment of the Division Bench, which was confirmed and appr....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the petitioners were entitled to the benefits of the Government Resolution dated 17.10.1988 and the revision of pay-scale as per the Fifth, Si....
Employees are entitled to a higher pay scale after 15 years of service based on government resolutions, irrespective of specific qualifications.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.