Back
HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK
Suresh Alamchand Bhambhani – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. In view of the fact that identical issue is involved in all the petitions, they are disposed of by this common judgment by treating Special Civil Application No.18621 of 2016 as lead matter. In the said lead matter being Special Civil Application No.18621 of 2016, the petitioner has prayed for below mentioned relief’s:-
(B) Your Lordships may be pleased to direct the respondent to pay the benefits of revised pay scale to the petitioner from 1.1.1986 as per order dated 31.03.2014 passed in L.P.A. No.834 of 2012 by this Honourable Court and order dated 30.7.2015 passed in M.C.A. No. (Contempt) No. 1868 of 2015 in the interest of justice.
(C) Your Lordships may be pleased to grant such other an further interim or other relief/s as may be deemed fit and proper in the interest of justice."
2. So far as the
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the petitioners were entitled to the benefits of the revised pay scale as per the judgment of the Division Bench, which was confirmed and appr....
The court reaffirmed the principle that equally situated persons should be treated equally in consonance with Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.
Members of the Petitioner Association ought to have been treated equally w.e.f. 1.1.1986. In view of this fact, we are of the opinion that the end of justice would be served if the respondents are di....
Similarly situated employees entitled to uniform notional pay fixation from 01.01.1996 under 5th CPC anomaly rectification, with actual benefits from 21.04.2004; prior judgments in rem mandate parity....
Retired Inspectors/Superintendents entitled to notional pay scale upgradation from 01.01.1996 and actual benefits from 21.04.2004, ensuring parity under Article 14; limitation inapplicable to recurri....
Similarly situated employees entitled to notional pay fixation w.e.f. 01.01.1996 and actual benefits from 21.04.2004 under 5th CPC upgradation; prior judgments in rem mandate parity despite delay in ....
Similarly situated employees entitled to notional pay upgradation w.e.f. 01.01.1996 under 5th CPC, actual benefits from 21.04.2004, ensuring Art.14 parity.
Similarly situated employees entitled to notional pay fixation w.e.f. 01.01.1996 and actual benefits w.e.f. 21.04.2004 per 5th CPC upgradation; prior parity judgments apply in rem, not personam; no l....
Similarly situated employees entitled to notional pay fixation w.e.f. 01.01.1996 under 5th CPC parity, actual benefits from 21.04.2004; Art.14 mandates uniform treatment.
Inspectors entitled to notional pay upgradation w.e.f. 01.01.1996 and actual benefits from 21.04.2004 based on anomaly committee and parity with similarly situated employees; prior judicial orders bi....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
