Back
VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI
Rutul Park Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. By way of present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners herein have prayed for the following reliefs:
A. This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction:
(i) Holding and declaring that the action of the respondent authorities of directing the petitioner no. 1 society and its members to repair and secure the dilapidated, dangerous and ruinous structure of the petitioner no. 1 society instead of taking appropriate steps to have the dangerous structure vacated/evicted and demolished, is without any application of mind, unconstitutional, unreasonable, irrational, unjustified, and amounts to a refusal to perform their duty under the provisions of the Gujarat Provisional Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 and is in clear disregard and contravention of the provisions of the Gujarat Ownership Flats Act, 1973.
(ii) Quashing and setting aside the notice dated 3.6.2022 issued by the respondent authorities to the extent that it seeks to direct the petitioner no. 1 society and its members to re
The court upheld the validity of the redevelopment process under Section 41A of the Gujarat Ownership Flats Act, 1973, and directed the respondents to vacate their flats and hand over peaceful and va....
The court upheld the validity of the redevelopment project under Section 41A of the Gujarat Ownership Flats Act, 1973, based on the majority consent of the members, dilapidated condition of the build....
The court upheld the validity of redevelopment processes of co-operative housing societies, emphasizing majority consent and the necessity of addressing safety concerns over minority objections.
A cooperative society can proceed with redevelopment if 75% of members consent, prioritizing safety and majority decisions over individual objections.
Majority consent in cooperative societies is binding for redevelopment under Section 41A of the Gujarat Ownership Flats Act, enabling courts to enforce compliance despite minority objections.
A co-operative society's decision for redevelopment, supported by majority consent, is binding on all members, and individual objections cannot impede the process if statutory conditions are satisfie....
Members of a cooperative society must adhere to the society's decisions and bylaws, losing individual rights in favor of collective governance.
A cooperative society's resolutions regarding redevelopment require majority consent, which prevails over minority objections; judicial review is limited to errors of law or process.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
