IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
Vaibhavi D. Nanavati, J.
Rutul Park Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. & Ors. - Appellant
Vs.
State Of Gujarat & Ors. - Respondent
Special Civil Application No. 9304 of 2023
Decided On : 18-04-2024
Mandamus - Redevelopment of Residential Society - Gujarat Ownership Flats Act, 1973 - Section 41A
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner No. 1, a co-operative housing society, sought to redevelop its dilapidated residential structure. The majority of the members consented to the redevelopment, but one member, respondent No. 6, objected to it. The society filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to vacate and hand over the flat for redevelopment.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the society complied with the conditions under Section 41A of the Gujarat Ownership Flats Act, 1973, as the building was over 25 years old, the structural engineer's report confirmed its dilapidated condition, and more than 75% of the members consented to the redevelopment. The objections raised by individual members were not maintainable, and the project was deemed to be in the larger public interest.
Issues: The main issue was whether the objections of individual members, particularly respondent No. 6, could stall the redevelopment process initiated by the majority consent of the society.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that once a co-operative society decides to redevelop its property and obtains the consent of the majority of its members, objections from individual members should not stall the redevelopment process. The court also emphasized that the objections of individual members are not maintainable when the society complies with the legal requirements for redevelopment.
Final Decision: The court allowed the petition, directing respondent No. 6 to vacate the flat and hand over peaceful possession for redevelopment within eight weeks, in accordance with Section 41A of the Gujarat Ownership Flats Act, 1973.
JUDGMENT :
1. By way of present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners herein have prayed for the following reliefs:
A. This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction:
(i) Holding and declaring that the action of the respondent authorities of directing the petitioner no. 1 society and its members to repair and secure the dilapidated, dangerous and ruinous structure of the petitioner no. 1 society instead of taking appropriate steps to have the dangerous structure vacated/evicted and demolished, is without any application of mind, unconstitutional, unreasonable, irrational, unjustified, and amounts to a refusal to perform their duty under the provisions of the Gujarat Provisional Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 and is in clear disregard and contravention of the provisions of the Gujarat Ownership Flats Act, 1973.
(ii) Quashing and setting aside the notice dated 3.6.2022 issued by the respondent authorities to the extent that it seeks to direct the petitioner no. 1 society and its members to repair and secure the dilapidated, dangerous and ruinous structure of the petitioner no. 1 society instead of taking appropriate steps to have the dangerous structure vacated/ evicted and demolished.
B. This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondent no. 6 to vacate his Flat No. A/1 in the petitioner society within such period as this Hon'ble Court considers appropriate, and further directing that if the respondent no. 6 fails to do so, the respondent nos. 2 to 4 authorities are to take appropriate steps for vacating/evicting the respondent no. 6 and demolishing the dangerous and dilapidated structure of the petitioner no. 1 society in terms of and in exercise of powers and duties under the provisions of the Gujarat Provisional Municipal Corporations Act, 1949.
C. Pending the admission, hearing and final disposal of the present petition, this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to stay and suspend the operation and implementation of the respondent authorities' direction, as contained in the notice dated 3.6.2022, directing the petitioner no. 1 society and its members to repair and secure the dilapidated, dangerous and ruinous structures of the petitioner no. 1 society.
D. Pending the admission, hearing and final disposal of the present petition, this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the respondent no. 6 to vacate his Flat No. A/1 in the petitioner society within such period as this Hon'ble Court considers appropriate, and further direct that if the respondent no. 6 fails to do so, the respondent nos. 2 to 4 authorities are to take appropriate steps for vacating/ evicting the respondent no. 6 and demolishing the dangerous and dilapidated structure of the petitioner no. 1 society in terms of and in exercise of powers and duties under the provisions of the Gujarat Provisional Municipal Corporations Act, 1949.
E. Ex parte ad interim relief in terms of prayers C and D hereinabove be granted.
F. Such other and further reliefs as may be deemed fit in the facts of the present case may be granted.”
2. The petitioner No. 1 is a co-operative housing society registered under the provisions of the Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act, 1961 vide registration No. GH 7007 dated 23.03.1978 and is the owner of land admeasuring 1000 sq. mt. in Final Plot No.117 paiki in T.P. Scheme No.19 in Mouje : Sheikpur-Khanpur, Ahmedabad – 3 (Memnagar Vibhag), Taluka : Sabarmati, District: Ahmedabad. The aforesaid is situated near Navrang Six Road, Naranpura, Ahmedabad. In 1978, a residential structure comprising of total 12 residential apartments (3 A type flats each admeasuring 175 sq. yd. Super built up area, 3 B type flats each admeasuring 126 sq. yd. Super built
Daman Singh v. State of Punjab
State of U.P v. Chheoki Employees Co-operative Society Ltd.
Binny Ltd. and Anr. versus V. Sadasivan and Others reported in (2005) 6 SCC 657
The court upheld the validity of the redevelopment process under Section 41A of the Gujarat Ownership Flats Act, 1973, and directed the respondents to vacate their flats and hand over peaceful and va....
The court upheld the validity of the redevelopment project under Section 41A of the Gujarat Ownership Flats Act, 1973, based on the majority consent of the members, dilapidated condition of the build....
The court upheld the validity of redevelopment processes of co-operative housing societies, emphasizing majority consent and the necessity of addressing safety concerns over minority objections.
A cooperative society can proceed with redevelopment if 75% of members consent, prioritizing safety and majority decisions over individual objections.
Majority consent in cooperative societies is binding for redevelopment under Section 41A of the Gujarat Ownership Flats Act, enabling courts to enforce compliance despite minority objections.
A co-operative society's decision for redevelopment, supported by majority consent, is binding on all members, and individual objections cannot impede the process if statutory conditions are satisfie....
Members of a cooperative society must adhere to the society's decisions and bylaws, losing individual rights in favor of collective governance.
A cooperative society's resolutions regarding redevelopment require majority consent, which prevails over minority objections; judicial review is limited to errors of law or process.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.