Back
PRANAV TRIVEDI
Mohitkumar Amrutlal Makvana – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Learned advocate Mr. Purvesh Prajapati appears for the respondent no.2 – original complainant. Learned APP has produced report of the Assistant Police Commissioner, Rajkot City dated 21.05.2024, which is taken on record.
2. Rule. Learned advocates waive service of notice of rule on behalf of respective respondents. By consent, Rule is fixed forthwith.
3. This application has been filed under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing and setting aside the FIR being FIR No.11208044220618 registered with Pradyumannagar Police Station, Dist.: Rajkot City for offences punishable under sections 3, 4(3), 5(a), 5(c) and 5(e) of the Gujarat Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 2020 and sections 504, 506(2) and 34 of IPC.
4. Mr. Pratik Y.Jasani, learned advocate for the applicants, submitted that the parties have settled the dispute amicably outside the Court and that there remains no grievance between them. Therefore, in the larger interest of the society, the impugned complaint may be quashed and set aside.
5. Mr. Purvesh Prajapati, learned advocate for respondent no.2 - original complainant, concurred with the factum of settlement of the dispute, as advanced by learned
The court can exercise inherent powers under section 482 of the Cr.P.C. to quash a criminal proceeding based on the settlement of a dispute between the parties, as laid down by the principles establi....
whether incorporation of Section 307 IPC is there for the sake of it or the prosecution has collected sufficient evidence, which if proved, would lead to framing the charge under Section 307 IPC
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
