GITA GOPI
Chaturbhai Motiram Patel – Appellant
Versus
Sahil Shatishbhai Roy – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The appellant is the original plaintiff in Regular Civil Suit no. 176 of 2012, who had filed the suit for eviction, which came to be allowed on 11.1.2018 by the learned Additional Civil Judge, Patan. Aggrieved by the judgment and decree, the defendant of the suit had preferred Regular Civil Appeal no. 8 of 2018, since the appeal was allowed on 29.11.2019, aggrieved and dissatisfied by the judgment of the First Appellate Court, the original plaintiff is before this Court in the Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (in short ‘CPC’) as an appellant.
2. The present appellant – plaintiff had urged before the learned Trial Court that he has purchased a shop no. 4/G in City Point Commercial Complex, Patan vide registered Sale Deed dated 7.1.2010. Thereafter on 14.6.2011, he entered into a rent agreement and let the premises on monthly rent of Rs.5,500/- for a period of 11 months and 29 days. After the determination of the said period, the plaintiff as owner of the property did not opt to renew the lease agreement and sought vacant, peaceful possession of the shop, contending that he was in genuine need. The plaintiff had further before the learn
Ram Swaroop v. Vishnu Narayan Inter College
Alizan Mian v. Naro Dusadh & Ors
Bhavanji Lakhamshi & Ors. v. Himatlal
Harvinder Singh & Ors. v. Pritam Kaur & Ors.
Kondiba Dagadu Kadam v. Savitribai Sopan Gujar & Ors.
Pankajbhai Murabhai Dhoria v. Shantilal Vallabhdas Jogia decd. through legal heirs & Ors.
Radhevlal Somsingh vs. Ratansingh Kishansingh 1977 MPLJ 335
R.V. Bhupal Prasad v. State of Andhra Pradesh
Sarup Singh Gupta v. S. Jagdish Singh & Ors. reported in (2006) 4 SCC 205
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.