ILESH J. VORA, S. V. PINTO
Laxmanbhai Khodabhai Senva – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
S.V. PINTO, J.
1. This appeal has been filed by the appellant under section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgement and order dated 7.10.2014 passed by the learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Kheda @ Nadiad (hereinafter referred to as the “learned trial court”) in Sessions Case No. 36 of 2014. The appellant is referred to as the accused as he stood in the original case for the sake of convenience, clarity and brevity.
2. The brief facts giving rise to the present appeal are as under.
2.1 As per the case of the prosecution, the accused was living with his wife, Masooriben in Bhathiji Faliya of village Ladwa and on 28.06.2013 at about 7:30 hours when they were at home, the accused had a doubt that his wife Masooriben had an affair with one Vikrambhai Bhalabhai Thakore, and he asked his wife where she had got the new sari from and had a quarrel with his wife. At that time, the accused got enraged and took a chopper and a knife and caused injuries on the chest and over the stomach of his wife and strangulated her and caused her death. The accused came to the Kathlal Police Station and filed the complaint before the PSI, Kathlal Police Station which was reg
Surinder Kumar versus Union Territory
The court ruled that a confession made to a police officer is inadmissible as evidence, and the conviction for murder was reduced to culpable homicide due to lack of premeditation.
The confessional statement of the Appellant was inadmissible under Sections 24 to 27 of the Evidence Act, and the remaining evidence was insufficient to prove the Appellant's guilt beyond reasonable ....
The prosecution must establish a complete chain of circumstantial evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, which was not achieved in this case.
The court held that acts committed under grave and sudden provocation may reduce the charge from murder to culpable homicide, emphasizing the absence of malicious intent.
The importance of proving the contents of a panchnama and the circumstances indicating intention to cause death, as outlined in the judgment of Pulicherla Nagaraju @ Nagaraja Reddy vs State of A.P.
Murder conviction upheld on circumstantial evidence via complete chain: homicidal death, last seen together, false explanation, body concealment, corroborated confessions, medical proof of fatal inju....
The prosecution must establish a complete chain of circumstantial evidence beyond reasonable doubt for a conviction under Section 302 IPC.
Section 304 Part II IPC relates to punishment but without any intention to cause death.
The conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC was upheld based on circumstantial evidence demonstrating a complete and unbroken chain leading to the appellant's guilt.
(1) Statement contained in FIR furnished by one of accused in the case cannot, in any manner, be used against another accused.(2) Doctor is not a witness of fact – A doctor is examined by prosecution....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.