HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY, J
PANCHABHAI @ PANKAJ NARANBHAI SHINGHAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for bail filed (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments for and against bail (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. consideration of factors for bail (Para 5) |
| 4. court's reasoning for bail (Para 6) |
| 5. bail granted with conditions (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
ORDER :
2. Heard learned Advocate for the Applicant and learned APP for the Respondent – State.
3. Learned Advocate for the Applicant has submitted that the Applicant has good reputation in the society and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicant in jail for indefinite period. It is further contended that the applicant is ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that may be imposed by this Court if released on bail.
5. Heard learned Advocates for the parties and perused the record. As per the case of the prosecution, the role attributed to the Applicant is to the effect that the Applicant is alleged to have purchased the goods from the first informant and had not paid the amount of consideration. Having regard to the nature of offence and the alolegations levelled against the Applicant, the Application deserves consideration. This court has also considered the following aspects:
(b) That the learned Advocate for the Applican
The court established that an applicant's good reputation and the nature of allegations can justify bail, subject to conditions to prevent tampering and ensure compliance.
The court granted bail despite the applicant's criminal history, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of the nature of allegations and the applicant's compliance with conditions.
The court ruled that the absence of material evidence linking the applicant to the alleged offence warranted the granting of bail, emphasizing the need for a prima facie case.
The court granted bail under BNSS Section 483, emphasizing the need for strict conditions due to the Applicant's criminal history and the nature of allegations.
The court emphasized the need to balance the gravity of allegations against the applicant's rights, allowing bail with strict conditions to prevent tampering with evidence.
The court granted bail based on the applicant's good reputation, the nature of allegations, and compliance with specific conditions, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of bail factors.
The court granted bail under BNSS Section 483, emphasizing the need to consider the prima facie case, custody duration, and potential flight risk, while imposing strict conditions to ensure complianc....
The court granted bail based on the Applicant's reputation and the completion of the investigation, imposing conditions to prevent tampering and ensure compliance.
The court granted bail considering the applicant's lack of prior criminal record and the completion of the investigation, emphasizing the importance of maintaining law and order during bail condition....
The court emphasized that insufficient evidence of direct involvement and the applicant's good reputation justified granting bail under Section 483 of the BNSS.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.