Back
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY, J
PANCHABHAI @ PANKAJ NARANBHAI SHINGHAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for bail filed (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments for and against bail (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. consideration of factors for bail (Para 5) |
| 4. court's reasoning for bail (Para 6) |
| 5. bail granted with conditions (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
ORDER :
1. The Applicant has filed this Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 for enlarging the Applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 1121002250121 of 2025 registered with Kapodra Police Station, Surat.
2. Heard learned Advocate for the Applicant and learned APP for the Respondent – State.
Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the Respondent - State.
3. Learned Advocate for the Applicant has submitted that the Applicant has good reputation in the society and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicant in jail for indefinite period. It is further contended that the applicant is ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that may be imposed by this Court if released on bail.
4. Per contra, learned APP has opposed the present application for grant of regular bail contending that the Applicant herein had purchased goods worth crores of rupees
The court established that an applicant's good reputation and the nature of allegations can justify bail, subject to conditions to prevent tampering and ensure compliance.
The court granted bail despite the applicant's criminal history, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of the nature of allegations and the applicant's compliance with conditions.
The court ruled that the absence of material evidence linking the applicant to the alleged offence warranted the granting of bail, emphasizing the need for a prima facie case.
The court granted bail considering custody duration and compliance with outlined conditions, emphasizing non-interference with judicial processes.
The court granted bail under BNSS Section 483, emphasizing the need for strict conditions due to the Applicant's criminal history and the nature of allegations.
The application for bail is granted under specified conditions to prevent witness tampering and ensure the attendance of Applicants during trial.
The court emphasized the need to balance the gravity of allegations against the applicant's rights, allowing bail with strict conditions to prevent tampering with evidence.
The court granted bail considering the applicant's reputation, gravity of allegations, and ensuring compliance with conditions while addressing risks related to flight and witness tampering.
The court granted bail based on the applicant's good reputation, the nature of allegations, and compliance with specific conditions, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of bail factors.
The court granted bail under BNSS Section 483, emphasizing the need to consider the prima facie case, custody duration, and potential flight risk, while imposing strict conditions to ensure complianc....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
