SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 89

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
AAYUSH UPENDRA RATHOD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR DIPESH D SONI(9996) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

RULE. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule for and on behalf of the respondent No.1 – State of Gujarat.

1. By way of the present application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant accused has prayed to release him on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in connection with the FIR being C.R. No. 11200010241826 of 2024 dated 24.11.2024 registered with Valsad Town Police Station, Valsad for the offences punishable under Sections 118(1) and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

2. Learned advocate for the applicant submits that the applicant has nothing to do with the offence and and therefore, custodial interrogation at this stage is not necessary. It is further submitted that the alleged incident took place between the neighbors in a pity quarrel and the present applicant through chutney on the face of complainant. It is alleged that the father of the applicant came with a knife and made assault to the victim and whereas the allegations against the present applicant is that of stone pelting. The injured victim is now out of danger and discharged from the hospital. Besides, the applicant is available during the course of invest

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top