SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 94

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
ASHVINBHAI LAVJIBHAI GAJERA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR JIGAR L PATEL(11596) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

Table of Content
1. applicant's business and allegations (Para 2)
2. opposition to anticipatory bail (Para 3)
3. factors for bail consideration (Para 4)
4. no prima facie case established (Para 5)
5. conditions for bail granted (Para 6 , 7 , 8)

ORDER :

RULE. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule for and on behalf of the respondent – State of Gujarat.

2. Learned advocate for the applicant submits that the applicant has nothing to do with the offence and he has been falsely implicated in the offence. The applicant is in the business of bus transport service in the name and style of Jai Khodiyar and having license of storage and to use as fuel he purchased the distillate oil under the pretext of said oil to be bio-diesel and vehicle was intercepted and at the fuel station co-accused Hitesh was working from whom he had sent through whatsapp soft copy of the bill issued by Reliance Industries. It is alleged that the said bill No.142082 was forged however, the Reliance Industries has clarified that said bill is issued by Reliance Industries but they have not mentioned Eicher Tanker No.GJ-03-BV- 6870 and the muddamal stored in the said vehicle was not sent by Reliance Industries. Hence, no

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top