SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 156

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HDS
MARGI VISHAL PATEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR PREMAL R JOSHI(1327) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J.

RULE. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule for and on behalf of the respondent – State of Gujarat.

1. By way of the present application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”), the applicant accused has prayed to release him on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in connection with the FIR being C.R. No.11215037250024 of 2025 registered with Vidyanagar Police Station, District Anand for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 504, 506(2), 465, 467, 468, 471 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

2. Learned advocate for the applicant submits that the applicant is a lady and she has nothing to do with the offence and has been falsely enroped in the offence, which allegedly occurred during the period from January, 2023 to April, 2024 for which the FIR is filed in January, 2025 i.e. after a delay of more than 9 months. Applicant is arraigned only because applicant is wife of accused No.1. The allegation in the FIR is that husband of the present applicant is partner of one Shiv Shakti Immigration and complainant approached the said firm for getting work permit VISA of UK and the husband of the a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top