SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 374

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY, J
IMRANBHAI KASAMBHAI CHAUHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR P P MAJMUDAR(5284) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

Table of Content
1. application for bail filed (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. opposition to bail application (Para 5)
3. investigation status and trial (Para 6)
4. factors for bail consideration (Para 7 , 12)
5. bail granted with conditions (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)

ORDER :

2. The Applicant has filed this Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for enlarging the Applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11203024221051 of 2022 registered with Junagadh City ‘B’ Division Police Station. Junagadh.

4. Learned Advocate for the Applicant has submitted that the Applicant has good reputation in the society and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicant in jail for indefinite period. It is further contended that the applicant is ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that may be imposed by this Court if released on bail.

5.1 Learned Advocate appearing for the original complainant has also opposed the present application contending that the applicant had mixed cyanide in the water-bottle of the deceased, due to consumption of the said water, the deceased had died. He therefore submitted to dismiss the present application.

7. This

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top