Back
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY, J
IMRANBHAI KASAMBHAI CHAUHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for bail filed (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. opposition to bail application (Para 5) |
| 3. investigation status and trial (Para 6) |
| 4. factors for bail consideration (Para 7 , 12) |
| 5. bail granted with conditions (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
ORDER :
1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of Rule on behalf of the Respondent-State.
2. The Applicant has filed this Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for enlarging the Applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11203024221051 of 2022 registered with Junagadh City ‘B’ Division Police Station. Junagadh.
3. Heard learned Advocate for the Applicant and learned APP for the Respondent – State.
4. Learned Advocate for the Applicant has submitted that the Applicant has good reputation in the society and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicant in jail for indefinite period. It is further contended that the applicant is ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that may be imposed by this Court if released on bail.
5. Per contra, learned APP has vehemently opposed the present application for grant of regular bail contending that the present applicant has active
The court granted bail considering the applicant's prolonged custody and the nature of allegations, imposing conditions to ensure compliance and prevent tampering with evidence.
The court granted bail under BNSS Section 483, emphasizing the need for strict conditions due to the Applicant's criminal history and the nature of allegations.
The court granted bail despite the applicant's criminal history, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of the nature of allegations and the applicant's compliance with conditions.
The court granted bail based on the applicant's good reputation, the nature of allegations, and compliance with specific conditions, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of bail factors.
The court granted bail considering the applicant's reputation, gravity of allegations, and ensuring compliance with conditions while addressing risks related to flight and witness tampering.
The court emphasized that insufficient evidence of direct involvement and the applicant's good reputation justified granting bail under Section 483 of the BNSS.
The court granted bail under BNSS Section 483, emphasizing the need to consider the prima facie case, custody duration, and potential flight risk, while imposing strict conditions to ensure complianc....
The court granted bail based on the Applicant's reputation and the completion of the investigation, imposing conditions to prevent tampering and ensure compliance.
The court granted bail considering custody duration and compliance with outlined conditions, emphasizing non-interference with judicial processes.
The court granted bail based on the applicant's compliance with conditions and the nature of the allegations, emphasizing the importance of the relationship history and the status of the investigatio....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
