HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MRM
ALTAFKHAN NAJIRKHAN PATHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
ORDER :
(M.R. MENGDEY, J.)
1. RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.
2. The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhit, 2023, for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R.NO. 11215035250030 of 2025 registered with Umreth Police Station, Anand.
3. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions. 4. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has opposed the present application, inter alia, contending that the applicant was caught red handed with possession of beef worth 20 kg. He, therefore, submitted to dismiss the present application.
5. I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and perused the papers. As per the case of prosecution, the applicant was caught red handed with possession of beef worth 20 kg. The present applicant is having no other antecedent.
6. This Court has also taken into consideration the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation, reported in [201
The court granted bail under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhit, 2023, emphasizing the applicant's lack of prior criminal record and the nature of the allegations.
The court emphasized the discretion in granting bail based on the nature of the offence and the applicant's circumstances, without delving into detailed evidence.
The court granted regular bail based on the completion of investigation and the nature of allegations, imposing specific conditions to ensure compliance.
The court granted bail based on the nature of the allegations and the applicant's limited role in the incident, emphasizing the need for conditions to prevent misuse of bail.
The court may grant bail under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhit, 2023, considering the nature of the offence and ensuring conditions to prevent misuse of liberty.
The court exercised discretion to grant bail based on the nature of allegations and the victim's stable condition, emphasizing the importance of not misusing liberty.
The court has discretion to grant bail under Section 483, considering the nature of allegations and ongoing investigation, while imposing conditions to prevent misuse of liberty.
The court granted bail based on the completion of the investigation and the applicant's lack of prior criminal record, imposing conditions to ensure compliance.
The court exercised discretion to grant bail under Section 483, imposing conditions to ensure the applicant's presence during trial due to prior absconding and lack of trial progress.
Insufficient evidence connecting the applicant to the offence justified the granting of bail under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhit, 2023.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.