SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 408

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER CHARGESHEET) NO. 5809 of 2025 ==========================================================
PINTU @ HIMMATSINH PRAVINSINH DABHI & ANR.
Versus STATE OF GUJARAT ==========================================================
Appearance:
KULDEEP J MEHTA(8571) for the Applicant(s) No. 1,2 MR ABHAYKUMAR P SHAH(3093) for the Applicant(s) No. 1,2 MS VRUNDA SHAH, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY Date : 19/03/2025

Petitioner Advocates:MR ABHAYKUMAR P SHAH(3093) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

The court exercised discretion to grant bail based on the nature of allegations and the victim's stable condition, emphasizing the importance of not misusing liberty.

Headnote:(A) Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhit, 2023 - Section 483 - Application for regular bail - Applicants alleged to have assaulted the victim with a knife and wooden log, causing severe injuries - Investigation complete and charge-sheet filed - Victim's condition stable - Court considers nature of allegations and law laid down in Sanjay Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation, [2012] 1 SCC 40. (Paras 2, 4, 5, 6, 7)

(B) Bail - Conditions for bail - Applicants released on bail with conditions to ensure they do not misuse liberty or obstruct investigation. (Paras 8, 9, 10)

(C) Judicial discretion - Court exercises discretion to grant bail based on prima facie assessment without delving into evidence in detail. (Paras 7, 11)

Facts of the case:
The applicants are accused of assaulting the victim, resulting in severe injuries requiring hospitalization. The investigation is complete, and the charge-sheet has been filed.

Findings of Court:
The court finds it appropriate to grant bail considering the nature of the allegations and the victim's stable condition.

Issues: The main issues addressed include the nature of the allegations against the applicants and the appropriateness of granting bail.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the discretion to grant bail is exercised based on the nature of allegations and the stability of the victim's condition, emphasizing that the trial court should not be influenced by preliminary observations made during bail proceedings.

Result: Application for bail allowed.

ORDER :

(M.R. MENGDEY, J.)

1. RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.

2. The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhit, 2023, for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R.NO. 11195044240937 of 2024 registered with Shihori Police Station, Banaskantha

3. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicants submits that considering the nature of the offence, the applicants may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

4. Learned APP has opposed the present application, inter alia, contending that the present applicants herein had assaulted the victim with knife and the weapon like wooden log and because of the assault, the victim had sustained severe injuries and was required to be hospitalized. The applicants are having several other antecedents. She, therefore, submitted to dismiss the present application.

5. I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and perused the papers. In present case, the investigation is over and charge-sheet has been filed. The applicants herein are alleged to have assaulted the victim with a knife and other weapons and because of the said assault, the victim had received severe injuries. However, presently, the condition of the victim is stated to be stable and out of danger.

6. This Court has also taken into consideration the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation, reported in [2012]1 SCC 40.

7. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of the allegations made against the applicants in the FIR, without discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.

8. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicants are ordered to be released on regular bail, on executing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that they shall;

(a) not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

(b) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution & shall not obstruct or hamper the police investigation and shall not to play mischief with the evidence collected or yet to be collected by the police;

(c) surrender passport, if any, to the Trial Court within a week;

(d) not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the Trial Court concerned;

(e) mark presence before the concerned Police Station once in a month for a period of six months between 11.00 a.m. and 2.00 p.m.;

(f) furnish the present address of their residences to the Investigating Officer and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior permission of Trial Court;

(g) not enter the area of Shihori Police Station for the period of six months except for the purpose of marking presence before the concerned Police Station and attending the trial proceedings.

9. The authorities will release the applicants only if they are not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter.

10. Bail bond to be executed before the lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with law.

11. At the trial, the trial Court shall not be influenced by the observations of preliminary nature qua the evidence at this stage made by this Court while enlarging the applicants on bail.

12. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent.

Direct service is permitted.  

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top