SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 366

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
DILIPBHAI @ DIPU GORDHANBHAI PRAJAPATI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR. JAY M THAKKAR(6677) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

(HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J.) 

1. RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.

2. The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.11215002241200 of 2024 registered with Anand Town Police Station, Anand for the offences punishable under Sections 189(2) , 191(3) , 191(2) , 64(2)(m), 190 , 351(3) , 352 and 329(3) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short “ IPC ”) / The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNS”) and Section 135 of the GP Act.

3. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that the applicant has nothing to do with the offence and he is falsely implicated in the offence. The applicant has been in jail since 30.11.2024. It is submitted that the charge sheet has been filed, and the investigation is over. Upon perusal of the FIR, it is evident that there was a consensual relationship between the applicant and the victim. It is further submitted that, considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be granted regular bail with the imposition of suitable conditions.

4. Learned APP appearing on behalf of th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top