SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 488

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
PARMAR MANOJ HASMUKHBHAI JOITARAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR AM PAREKH(562) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

1. RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.

2. The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for successive regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.11217041240411 /2024 registered with Saraswati Police Station, Patan for the offences punishable under Section 137(2), 87, 64(2) (M) of the BNS and Section 3(a), 4, 5(L), 6, 8 and 17 of the POCSO Act.

3. The learned advocate for the applicants submits that the applicant has no involvement in the offence and has been falsely implicated. Now nothing is required to be recovered and discovered from the accused. Present applicant is 20 years old and he is arrested on 26.08.2024. There was affair between the present applicant and they have contact with each other through instagram. Charge-sheet is filed. Commencement of trial will take its own time. He therefore submits that, considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on successive regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

4. Learned advocate for the respondent No.2 has tendered the affidavit filed by the original Complainant respondent No.2, which is tak

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top