SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 665

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HDS
SHANIBHAI MAHESHBHAI @ SUKHABHAI VEGDA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR ASHISH M DAGLI(2203) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

(HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J.)

[1.0] RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.

[2.0] The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for successive regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.11203039240325 /2024 registered with Mendarda Police Station, Junagadh for the offences punishable under Section 64 of the BNS.

[3.0] The learned advocate for the applicants submits that the applicant has no involvement in the offence and has been falsely implicated. Now nothing is required to be recovered and discovered from the accused. Present applicant is 25 years old and he is arrested on 09.09.2024. No past antecedent is reported against the present applicant. There is consensual relationship between the present applicant and victim as family family came to know about the relationships and both have consumed poinsonous substance and after the said incident, they were survive. Commencement of trial will take its own time. He therefore submits that, considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on successive regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

[4.0] The Learned AP

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top