HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
AMITBHAI HAJABHAI ZALA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
ORDER :
1. RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.
2. The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.11202014240554 of 2024 registered with Dhrol Police Station, Jamnagar for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 109(1), 352, 351(3), 221, 189(2), 191(2), 190, 121(1) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 / The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023( for short “BNS”) and Section 135 of the Gujarat Police Act.
3. Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that the applicant has nothing to do with the offence and he is falsely implicated in the offence. The applicant is in jail since 08.08.2024. It is further submitted that, considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be granted regular bail with imposition of suitable conditions.
4. Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the offence and now nothing is required to be recovered or discovered as the charge-sheet has been filed. The applicant is in jail since 08.08.2024. The co-accused
Sanjay Chandra vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
Gudikanti Narasimhulu And Ors vs. Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Bail is the rule and jail the exception, emphasizing personal liberty under Article 21, especially when pre-trial detention amounts to wrongful conviction.
Bail is a rule and jail is an exception, emphasizing personal liberty and the need for careful consideration of the accused's circumstances.
Bail is the rule, and pre-trial detention should not equate to conviction, emphasizing personal liberty under Article 21.
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; courts must consider the nature of accusations and the presumption of innocence when granting bail.
Bail is a rule and jail is an exception; personal liberty under Article 21 must be upheld unless justified otherwise.
The principle of bail as a rule and jail as an exception is upheld, emphasizing personal liberty and the presumption of innocence.
The court emphasized that bail is a rule and pre-trial detention is an exception, affirming the presumption of innocence and personal liberty under Article 21.
Bail is a rule and jail is an exception; personal liberty must be prioritized, especially when investigation is complete and no serious threat exists.
The court emphasized that bail is a rule and pre-trial detention is an exception, prioritizing personal liberty and the absence of evidence against the accused.
Bail is a rule and jail is an exception; pre-trial detention is unjustified when significant delays in prosecution occur.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.