SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 747

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HDS
JAGMAL KANJIBHAI SAPRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR KEVAL G BRAHMBHATT (BAROT)(9900) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

(HASMUKH D. SUTHAR,  J.) 

[1.0] RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent- State.

[2.0] The present successive application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.11204045240229 of 2024 registered with Nadiad Rural Police Station, District Kheda for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 370(2)(3), 376(2)(L)(N), 323 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short “IPC”).

[3.0] Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that applicant has been falsely implicated in the offence. The allegation against the applicant is that he introduced one Madhuben and his friend Natubhai who are already considered for bail. Present applicant is not having any past antecedent. Further, the charge-sheet is filed and now nothing is required to be recovered or discovered. He therefore submits that, considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

[4.0] Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has opposed the present application and requested to dismiss the present appli

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top