SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 676

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HDS
PRADIPBHAI RANCHHODBHAI MAKWANA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR P P MAJMUDAR(5284) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

(HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J.)

RULE. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule for and on behalf of the respondent No.1 – State of Gujarat.

1. By way of the present application under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the applicant accused has prayed to release him on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in connection with the FIR being C.R. No.11198006250037 of 2025 registered with Ghogha Road Police Station, Bhavnagar for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120(b) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short “IPC”) / The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNS”). .

2. Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that the applicant has nothing to do with the offence and he is falsely implicated in the offence. It is submitted that the prosecution alleges that since 12.06.2023, the original informant has been serving as the Regional Head (AGM) at the Bank of Baroda's Bhavnagar office. Under a government scheme for small-scale industries, loans were sanctioned based on applications verified by the bank’s Branch Manager and Credit Officer. However, an audit in April 2023 revealed that multiple

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top