SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 436

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MRM
BHAVESH ARVINDBHAI CHAUHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:AMBRISH V JANI(8674) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

(M. R. MENGDEY, J.)

1. RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.

2. The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhit, 2023, for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R.NO. 11196008230478 of 2023 registered with J.P.Road Police Station, Vadodara

3. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

4. Learned APP has opposed the present application, inter alia, contending the there are 9 antecedents of similar nature against the present applicant. The applicant herein had collected huge amounts from the first informant as well as other victims for processing their Visa and work permit in the foreign countries and after having obtained the huge amount from them, the applicant had not provided them the Visa or the work permit. The applicant had also forged the work permits of various countries in the names of first informant as well as other victims. He, therefore, submitted to dismiss the present application.

5. I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respec

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top