HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY, J
BABULAL GANGARAM PRAJAPATI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of Rule on behalf of the Respondent-State.
2. The Applicant has filed this Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita ( BNSS ) for enlarging the Applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11191045250178 of 2025 registered with Sola High Court Police Station. Ahmedabad City.
3. Heard learned Advocate for the Applicant and learned APP for the Respondent – State.
4. Learned Advocate for the Applicant has submitted that the Applicant has good reputation in the society and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicant in jail for indefinite period. It is further contended that the applicant is ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that may be imposed by this Court if released on bail.
5. Per contra, learned APP has vehemently opposed the present application for grant of regular bail contending that the applicant herein had assaulted the victims with an iron pipe and had given blows on the vital parts of their body. Thus, the victims had sustained severe injuries in the incident. The investigation of the offence is still in progress. Learned APP therefore submitted that lookin
The court emphasized that bail may be granted if the applicant shows no flight risk and the investigation is complete, while imposing strict conditions to prevent tampering with evidence.
The court granted bail based on insufficient evidence linking the applicant to the crime, emphasizing the need for a prima facie case.
The court ruled that prolonged incarceration without trial progress warrants bail, emphasizing the importance of timely justice.
The court may grant bail after considering the gravity of the offense, the applicant's history of absconding, and the conditions necessary to ensure trial attendance.
The court ruled that bail may be granted considering the nature of allegations, the applicant's role in the offense, and the absence of direct fatal involvement.
The court emphasized the balance between the severity of the offence and the rights of the accused, allowing bail based on the Applicant's reputation and the victims' stable condition.
The court established that bail can be granted by considering the nature of allegations, the applicant's reputation, and compliance with specific conditions to ensure trial integrity.
The court granted bail considering the nature of the offence and the applicant's willingness to comply with conditions, emphasizing the balance between individual rights and public interest.
The court granted bail considering the applicant's age and lack of flight risk, emphasizing the need for strict compliance with conditions to prevent tampering with evidence.
The court granted bail considering the applicant's age and the nature of allegations, emphasizing the need for careful evaluation of bail conditions.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.