SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 501

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MRM
HITESHBHAI RAMESHBHAI PATEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR. MAULIK M SONI(7249) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

(M. R. MENGDEY, J.)

1. RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.

2. The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhit, 2023, for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R.NO. 11821050250126 of 2025 registered with Sagtala Police Station, Dahod

3. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

4. Learned APP has opposed the present application, inter alia, contending that the car of the present applicant is seen in the CCTV footage. The said car had been used for transportation of the dead-body of the deceased after the incident had taken place. Thus, there is an active participation on the part of present applicant in commission of the offence. The investigation of the offence is still in progress. She, therefore, submitted to dismiss the present application.

5. I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and perused the papers. The role attributed to the present applicant in commission of the offence is to the effect that the applicant had

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top