SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 198

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY, J
RAVI @ KANCHO KANUBHAI THAKOR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR HEMANT B RAVAL(3491) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

Table of Content
1. application for bail filed (Para 2 , 6)
2. arguments for and against bail (Para 3 , 4)
3. court's consideration of facts (Para 5)
4. court's reasoning for bail (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)

ORDER :

1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent-State.

3. Learned advocate for the applicant has submitted that considering the nature of offence and role attributed to the applicant, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

5. Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties and perused the material available on record. From the record it appears that the investigation is over and Charge-sheet has already been filed. From the record it appears that earlier, the applicant was enlarged on bail by this Court. Thereafter, the applicant did not remain present before the concerned Court on two occassions. Therefore, non-bailable warrant came to be issued against the present applicant. Having regard to these facts, the present application deserves to be allowed.

(a) As per catena of decisions of Hon’ble Supreme Court, there are mainly 3 factors which are required to be considered by this court i.e. prima facie case, availa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top