HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY, J
DHANRAJ MURARSHA BHANDGE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
ORDER :
M. R. MENGDEY, J.
1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent-State.
2. This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita for regular bail in connection with F.I.R. No.11203006240139 of 2024 registered with Bantva Police Station, District Junagadh.
3. Learned advocate for the applicant has submitted that considering the nature of offence and role attributed to the applicant, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.
4. The learned APP appearing for the respondent State has vehemently submitted that the applicant had inflicted some injuries to the victim and looted valuable muddamal. Learned APP has, therefore, submitted that the offences which have been charged, are serious in nature and looking to the facts as well as the allegations levelled against the applicant, no discretion is required to be exercised.
5. Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties and perused the material available on record. From the record it appears that the investigation is over and Charge-sheet has already been filed. From the record it appears that the other co-accused who are similarly si
The court may grant bail considering the nature of the offence, completion of investigation, and risk of flight, imposing necessary conditions to ensure compliance.
The court established that bail may be granted based on the nature of allegations, custody duration, and precedents, emphasizing judicial discretion in such matters.
The court granted bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, emphasizing the need for conditions to prevent tampering with evidence and ensure the applicant's presence during t....
The court granted bail based on the completion of investigation and the applicant's custody status, emphasizing the need for conditions to prevent tampering with evidence.
The court emphasized the balance between individual liberty and public interest in bail applications, allowing bail based on the completion of investigation and the nature of allegations.
The court established the criteria for bail consideration under Section 483, emphasizing the need for lawful conduct and compliance with trial procedures.
The court may grant bail under Section 483 considering the nature of the offence, the applicant's antecedents, and the need to prevent tampering with evidence.
The court may grant bail under Section 439 considering the nature of the offence, previous absences, and ensuring the accused's presence at trial.
The court emphasized the need for discretion in granting bail, considering the applicant's compliance with conditions and the nature of the allegations.
Bail can be granted considering the nature of the offence, provided conditions are imposed to ensure presence and compliance during the trial.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.