SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 615

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
MUKESHBHAI @ MUKESHCHANDRA GOBUSINGH VANJARA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR RAKESH G RAJ(10527) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

1. RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.

2. The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for successive regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.11201002240059 of 2024 registered with C.I.D. Crime Ahmedabad Zone Police Station, Ahmedabad for the offences punishable under Sections 319, 336, 338, 340 and 61 of the BNS and Section 7(1) of the State Emblem of India (Prohibition of Improper Use) Act, 2005.

3. Learned advocate for the applicant submits that the applicant has no involvement in the alleged offence and has been falsely implicated. The applicant was arrested on October 26, 2024. It is contended that no further recovery or discovery is required from the applicant. The applicant is arraigned as accused No.8, referred to as “Modha Saheb,” but he has neither met the complainant nor any witnesses and has not played any active role in the alleged commission of the offence. During the investigation, no material or evidence has been collected indicating the applicant's involvement concerning the acceptance or demand of any money or the creation of any forged documents. N

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top