SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 670

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HDS
ARIF SIDDIQUE KURKUR (AARIF SIDDIQUE KURKUR) – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR ASHISH M DAGLI(2203) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

(HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J.)

[1.0] RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.

[2.0] The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for successive regular bail in connection with FIR being FIR being C.R. No.11207002240381/ 2024 registered with Godhra ‘B’ Division Police Station, Panchmahal for the offences punishable under Sections 336(2), 337, 338, 336(3), 340(2), 341(1) and 61(2) of BNS.

[3.0] The learned advocate for the applicants submits that the applicant has no involvement in the offence and has been falsely implicated. The applicant was arrested on 20.10.2024. Nothing is required to be recovered and discovered from the accused. Investigation is over and charge-sheet is filed. Applicant is having no past antecedents. He therefore submits that, considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on successive regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

[4.0] Learned APP has vehemently opposed the present application on the ground that merely filing of the charge-sheet is not a ground to grant bail. It is submitted that sufficient material is collected against the prese

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top