SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 675

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HDS
AMITKUMAR KARSHANBHAI BABARIYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:KRUSHALKUMAR D SHELADIYA(8017) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

(HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J.)

[1.0] RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.

[1.0] By way of the present application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant accused has prayed to release him on anticipatory bail in the event of her arrest in connection with the FIR being C.R. No.11210060242071 / 2024 registered with Varachha Police Station, Surat for the offences punishable under Sections 65(e), 81 and 98(2) of the Prohibition Act.

[2.0] Learned advocate for the applicant submits that the applicant has nothing to do with the offence and he is falsely enroped in the offence and the allegations against the present applicant is that he is proposed receiver of the alleged contraband and huge quantity of contraband IMFL containing 1584 bottles worth Rs.1,81,440/- was seized. Co-accused are already arrested and thereafter, released on anticipatory bail. Applicant is having no past antecedents of similar nature under the Prohibition Act and therefore, custodial interrogation at this stage is not necessary. Besides, the applicant is available during the course of investigation and will not flee from justice. In view of the above, the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top