SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 742

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL) NO. 3391 of 2025 ==========================================================
JAGDISHBHAI BABUBHAI MALVIYA Versus STATE OF GUJARAT ==========================================================
Appearance:
MR P P MAJMUDAR(5284) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 A S TIMBALIA(7372) for the Respondent(s) No. 1 MR HK PATEL, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR Date : 17/03/2025

Petitioner Advocates:MR P P MAJMUDAR(5284) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

The court emphasized the careful consideration of bail applications, balancing the seriousness of charges against the applicant's cooperation with the investigation.

Headnote:(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 482 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 420 and 114 - Anticipatory bail application - The applicant, falsely implicated, seeks bail; the court considers the nature of the accusation and applicant's cooperation in the investigation. (Paras 2, 7, 8)

(B) Bail - Factors for consideration - The court must judiciously weigh the nature of the accusation, applicant's antecedents, and potential for fleeing justice. (Paras 7, 8)

Facts of the case:
The applicant is accused in FIR C.R. No.11210055241462 of 2024 for offences under IPC Sections 420 and 114, claiming false implication.

Findings of Court:
The applicant is granted anticipatory bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- with conditions for cooperation and presence at the police station.

Issues: The court addressed the applicant's false implication and the gravity of the offence.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for careful consideration of bail applications, balancing the seriousness of the charges against the applicant's cooperation with the investigation.

Result: Application allowed.

ORDER :

(HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J.)

1. RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.

2. By way of the present application under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the applicant accused has prayed to release him on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in connection with the FIR being C.R. No.11210055241462 of 2024 registered with Salabatpura Police Station, Surat for the offences punishable under Sections 420 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

3. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that the applicant has nothing to do with the offence and he is falsely implicated in the offence. It is further submitted that, considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be granted bail with the imposition of suitable conditions.

4. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has opposed grant of regular bail looking to the nature and gravity of the offence. Therefore, the present application may be dismissed.

7. Having heard the learned advocate for the parties and perusing the investigation papers, it is equally incumbent upon the Court to exercise its discretion judiciously, cautiously and strictly in compliance with the basic principles laid down in a plethora of decisions of the Hon’ble Apex Court on the point. It is well settled that, among other circumstances, the factors to be borne in mind while considering an application for bail are (i) the nature and gravity of the accusation; (ii) the antecedents of the applicant including the fact as to whether he has previously undergone imprisonment on conviction by a Court in respect of any cognizable offence; (iii) the possibility of the applicant to flee from justice; and (iv) where the accusation has been made with the object of injuring or humiliating the applicant by having him so arrested. Though at the stage of granting bail an elaborate examination of evidence and detailed reasons touching the merit of the case, which may prejudice the accused, should be avoided. I have considered the following aspects.

(i) The offence is punishable by up to seven years.

(ii) The applicant has already joined the investigation and cooperate in the investigation in compliance with the notice issued by the investigating officer under Section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”)

8. Considering the aforesaid aspects and the law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. reported in (2011) 1 SCC 6941, wherein the Hon’ble Apex Court reiterated the law laid down by the Constitution Bench in the case of Shri Gurubaksh Singh Sibbia & Ors. reported in (1980) 2 SCC 665 and also the decision in the case of Sushila Aggarwal v. State (NCT of Delhi) reported in (2020) 5 SCC 1, I am inclined to allow the present application.

9. In the result, the present application is allowed by directing that in the event of arrest / appearance of the applicant in connection with the FIR being C.R. No.11210055241462 of 2024 registered with Salabatpura Police Station, Surat the applicant shall be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with one surety of like amount on the following conditions that applicant :

(a) shall cooperate with the investigation and make himself available for interrogation whenever required;

(b) shall remain present at the concerned Police Station on 24/03/2025 between 11.00 a.m. and 2.00 p.m. and the IO shall ensure that no unnecessary harassment or inconvenience is caused to the applicant;

(c) shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the fact of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer;

(d) shall not obstruct or hamper the police investigation and not to play mischief with the evidence collected or yet to be collected by the police;

(e) shall at the time o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top