Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SANGEETA K.VISHEN, MOOL CHAND TYAGI
Jadiben D/O Maganbhai Nathabhai Raval – Appellant
Versus
Lh Of Decd Somabhai Nathabhai Raval – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(PER : HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SANGEETA K. VISHEN)
1. Captioned appeal is directed against the judgment dated 21.09.2024 (hereinafter referred to as "the impugned judgment") passed by the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ahmedabad (Rural) in Special Civil Suit No. 345 of 2021 (hereinafter referred to as "the suit") whereby the application Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as "the Code") filed by the defendant nos. 16 to 22 has been allowed, and the plaint came to be rejected. Hence, the present appeal. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their status in the suit.
-
2. Mr.Sikander Saiyed, learned Advocate appearing with Mr.S.V. Shah, learned Advocate for the plaintiffs, relying upon the family tree, submitted that the plaintiffs are from the branch of Maganbhai Nathabhai, the son of Nathabhai Jivaniya. Maganbhai Nathabhai had two brothers Somabhai Nathabhai and Bababhai Nathabhai. It is submitted that Maganbhai Nathabhai had five children including the plaintiffs. After the death of Maganbhai Nathabhai in the year 1970, vide entry no. 1281, names of his heirs, including the plaintiffs were posted an
The court found that vague allegations of fraud do not suffice to circumvent established limitation periods, and a registered deed remains binding unless disproven by specific and detailed allegation....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for a meaningful reading of the plaint, scrutiny of the cause of action, and prevention of illusory causes of action to avoid circumventin....
Point of law: Rejection of plaint - Clever or ingenious drafting cannot mask the Court for consideration of am application seeking rejection of the plaint when the suit is barred by limitation on the....
The limitation period for challenging registered sale deeds starts upon acquiring knowledge of the transaction, not merely from the registration date, reaffirming the necessity of trial for evidentia....
(1) Plaint which is vexatious, illusory cause of action and barred by limitation, ought to be rejected in exercise of powers under Order VII Rule 11(a) and (d) of CPC.(2) Rejection of plaint – While ....
A document creating a future division of property does not require registration and is admissible; previous partition must be proven by clear evidence to validate a sale deed executed beyond lawful s....
A suit filed to declare a sale deed null and void is barred by limitation if not filed within three years from the date of registration, and must disclose a valid cause of action.
Legislature has not prescribed any period of limitation for filing a suit for partition because partition an incident attached to property and there is always a running cause of action for seeking pa....
A trial court must not reject a plaint due to limitations or merits without allowing the necessary factual determination, especially when a suit for partition can be filed upon arising cause of actio....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
