Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
JAYANT BANERJI, K. V. ARAVIND
Kempamma, D/o. Hombale @ Honbale Shetty – Appellant
Versus
Sothamma, D/o. Agasara Hombale, Since Dead By Lrs.- Mahadevashetty (S/o. Mahadevashetty And Late Mahadevamma) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. short question of law involved. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. defendant claims suppression of facts. (Para 5 , 12) |
| 3. details of property and heirs. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. court's assessment of alienation and rights. (Para 13 , 16) |
| 5. limitation period and cause of action. (Para 17 , 20 , 21) |
| 6. trial court's order set aside. (Para 22 , 26) |
| 7. importance of compliance with procedural rules. (Para 23 , 24 , 25) |
JUDGMENT :
JAYANT BANERJI, J.
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for respondent No.12, though the name of learned counsel Sri. C.K.Rudramurthy for R1 (B) to (E) is shown and all the other respondents have been served, and other counsel appear for the other respondents.
2. The learned counsel for the parties have consented that despite the matter being listed for admission, since a short question of law is involved and the original record is available, this case may be considered at this stage itself, for disposal.
3. Learned counsel for the plaintiff/appellant Sri.H.M. Manjesh has submitted that the learned trial Court has rejected the plaint of the appellant on the basis of an application moved under Order VII Rule 11(a) and (d) of the CIVIL PR
A trial court must not reject a plaint due to limitations or merits without allowing the necessary factual determination, especially when a suit for partition can be filed upon arising cause of actio....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for a meaningful reading of the plaint, scrutiny of the cause of action, and prevention of illusory causes of action to avoid circumventin....
Point of law: Rejection of plaint - Clever or ingenious drafting cannot mask the Court for consideration of am application seeking rejection of the plaint when the suit is barred by limitation on the....
Allegations of fraud can affect limitation in civil suits and warrant careful consideration rather than outright dismissal of plaints.
The limitation period for challenging registered sale deeds starts upon acquiring knowledge of the transaction, not merely from the registration date, reaffirming the necessity of trial for evidentia....
A cause of action must be assessed holistically, considering all relevant evidence, and cannot be dismissed solely based on preceding legal findings or limitations without a comprehensive examination....
A suit filed to declare a sale deed null and void is barred by limitation if not filed within three years from the date of registration, and must disclose a valid cause of action.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a suit for partition can be barred by law and limitation if there is already a decree and final decree in place, and the plaintiff fails to en....
The court emphasized that questions of limitation and cause of action are mixed issues of law and fact best resolved at trial, not at the application stage.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
