SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Gau) 64

KALYAN RAI SURANA
Sahidur Islam, S/o- Moktel Hussain – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. P.K. Deka, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Mr. P.K. Borah, Mr. S. Borah, Standing Counsel

JUDGMENT :

Heard Mr. P.K. Deka, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P.K. Borah, learned standing counsel for the Elementary Education Department, appearing for respondent nos. 1 to 3 and 5, Mr. S. Borah, learned standing counsel for respondent no. 4, Mr. P. Saikia, learned Government Advocate, representing respondent no. 6, as well as Mr. M.H. Ahmed, learned counsel for the private respondent nos. 7 and 8.

2) The case of the petitioner is that as per resolution no. 2 adopted in the meeting no. 38 dated 21.03.2008 by the Managing Committee, vide letter dated 21.03.2008 issued by the Headmaster & Secretary of the said school had appointed the petitioner as an H.S. Science Teacher of the West Gaspara Girls’ M.E. Madrassa. It is projected that as the petitioner was mainly teaching Social Studies. Despite recommendation made by the District Scrutiny Committee for provincialisation of his service against Social Studies subject, the Director of Elementary Education, Assam, (respondent no. 2) had issued the impugned order, thereby provincialising the service of 3 (three) A

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top