THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI AT GUWAHATI (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Principal Seat at Guwahati
ROBIN PHUKAN, J
Mrs. Dipa Devi, W/o Fatik Ch. Nath - Appellant
Versus
The State Of Assam - Respondent
WP(C) 5125 / 2024
Decided On : 28-02-2025
(A) Assam Education (Provincialisation of Services of Teachers and Reorganization of Educational Institutions) Act, 2017 - Provincialisation of service - Petitioner's claim for provincialisation rejected due to absence in DISE records for specific years - Court found that the petitioner had been continuously serving since 2007-08 and was not at fault for the absence in records - Court emphasized equality under law as the Headmistress was provincialised despite similar circumstances - Impugned order set aside, and directions issued for provincialisation effective January 2021. (Paras 12 , 21 , 22 )
Facts of the case:
The petitioner, appointed in 1984, claimed provincialisation of her service which was denied based on DISE records showing her absence for 2009-12, despite being captured from 2012-2023.
Findings of Court:
The court ruled that the petitioner was not responsible for the absence in records and should be treated equally to the Headmistress, whose service was provincialised under similar circumstances.
Issues: The main issues were whether the petitioner was unfairly denied provincialisation of service due to administrative negligence and whether her right to equality was violated.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner's continuous service and the administrative failure to reflect her name in DISE records should not disadvantage her, and that equal treatment under the law must be upheld.
Result: Petition allowed; service of the petitioner directed to be provincialised effective January 2021.
JUDGMENT :
Heard Mr. Z. Hamad, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. B. Kaushik, learned Standing Counsel for the Elementary Education Department, appearing for respondent Nos. 1, 3 & 4; and Mr. P. Nayak,earned Standing Counsel for the SSA, appearing for respondent No. 2.
2. In this petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, namely, Mrs. Dipa Devi has prayed for directing the respondent authorities, especially the respondent No. 2 (Director of Elementary Education, Assam) to provincialise the service of the petitioner on the basis of materials available on the record and for setting aside the impugned order dated 20.06.2023, passed by the Director of Elementary Education, Assam, which was passed arbitrarily without justifying the nature and circumstances of the case in its proper perspective. It is to be noted here that vide impugned order dated 20.06.2023, the respondent No.2 had rejected the claim of the petitioner for provincialisation of her service.
Background fact:-
3. The background facts leading to filing of this present petition is briefly stated as under:-
The court established that administrative negligence in record-keeping cannot justify the denial of provincialisation of service, ensuring equal treatment under the law.
The omission of a qualified teacher from the provincialization list is arbitrary and violates statutory provisions and principles of natural justice.
Claim made by the respondent no. 9 that he was working in the Kurshakati M.E. Madrassa from 14.11.2006 till his name was entered as Headmaster w.e.f. 30.09.2011 in the DISE data does not inspire the ....
The absence of names in DISE Data does not justify exclusion from provincialisation under the Assam Education Act; teachers in Venture Junior Colleges are not required to be listed in DISE Code.
Point of Law : Issue relating to the claim of provincialisation of the service of (a) Sahidur Islam (petitioner), (ii) Abdur Rashid Sk (respondent no. 7), and (iii) Abual Hussain Sk (respondent no.8)....
The Court established that seniority for provincialization of teachers' services must be determined based on accurate service records as per the Assam Education Act, 2017.
The court established that eligibility for provincialization of teachers' services must be based on verified service records and seniority, as per the provisions of the relevant Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.