JUDGMENT :

Heard Mr. A.R. Bhuyan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P.K. Borah, learned Standing Counsel for the Elementary Education Department, representing respondent nos. 1 to 3, 5 and 6, Mrs. D.D. Barman, learned Additional Senior Government, representing respondent no. 4 and Mr. M.A. Sheikh, learned counsel for respondent no. 9. None appears on call for the respondent nos. 7 and 8 although notice is deemed to be duly served.

2) The connected interlocutory application has been filed under Article 226 (3) of the Constitution of India by the respondent no. 9 in the writ petition for vacating the interim order dated 27.09.2021. In the said interlocutory application, (i) the petitioner has been arrayed as opposite party no.1, (ii) the Elementary Education Department and its authorities are arrayed as opposite party nos. 2 to 4, 6 and 7, (iii) the respondent no. 4 has been arrayed as opposite party no. 5 and the School Managing Committee has been arrayed as opposite party no. 8, and (iv) the Headmaster of the Kurshakati M.E. Madrassa has been arrayed as opposite party no. 9. In this order, for the sake of clarity, the parties have been referred to as per their positi