Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
R.M. Chhaya, Soumitra Saikia, JJ.
Krishna Kanta Debnath S/o Hirendra Chandra Debnath – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Assam Rep. By The Comm. and Secy. and ors. – Respondents
WP(C) 8682, 5480, 5992 of 2019, 7959 of 2017, 840 of 2018, 4250 of 2020, 571 of 2022
Decided On : 07-09-2022
Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 226 – Power of High court to issue writs – Held, At request of learned Standing Counsel, Secondary Education Department, matter is adjourned – Ordered accordingly.
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Mr. B. Purkayastha, learned counsel for the writ petitioner.
2. At the request of Mr. R. Mozumdar, learned Standing Counsel, Secondary Education Department, Assam, the matter is adjourned to 20.10.2022.
The court established that administrative bodies must act promptly on pending representations to uphold the rights of individuals in educational contexts.
Court accepts bank's submission on document release and disposes writ petition.
The court may grant adjournments to ensure all parties are adequately represented and have the opportunity to file necessary legal documents.
Impleadment of necessary parties in a Writ Petition.
A writ petition may be closed when the petitioner voluntarily submits that the prayers sought no longer require adjudication due to subsequent events.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
